Author Topic: Sniffer dog  (Read 18779 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #60 on: March 14, 2012, 06:22:PM »

Why are you hyperventilating over Mr Mercer's evidence, simong? Does this case have personal significance for you?



You and your brother used to get very hot under the collar about this case, didn't you?

Offline simong

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #61 on: March 14, 2012, 06:34:PM »

Why are you hyperventilating over Mr Mercer's evidence, simong? Does this case have personal significance for you?

Hello Keira, I don't appear to be hyperventilating. I apologise profusely if that is the impression i have given you. P.C Mercer worked on the case and works near where i live. The fact that he was a police officer and firmly believes in Jeremy Bambers innocence makes him a very interesting person to meet, i feel.

Personal Significance? difficult question but i will say Yes.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #62 on: March 14, 2012, 06:37:PM »
Hi Simong  ;D

Nice to see you,as always.

Offline simong

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #63 on: March 14, 2012, 06:39:PM »


You and your brother used to get very hot under the collar about this case, didn't you?

I am not sure that this is relevant to the thread Keira.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #64 on: March 14, 2012, 06:43:PM »
Andrea how old is your profile photo?


Why do you want to know that then?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #65 on: March 14, 2012, 06:53:PM »
Ngb you are aware of who is making the documentary and I know hours of filming has been done but who knows what makes the final cut

I am confident it will shake the public watching

Jack, it might not shake anyone who is as familiar with the case, such as us or the other forum.  Since both sets of forum members are aware of the new evidence. 

I am of course still looking forward to seeing it.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #66 on: March 14, 2012, 07:32:PM »
Rochy when was there a prime time documentary on the Bamber case last?

Twitter is flooded with law students who believe he is innocent, they are obviously interested in MOJ cases

I expect the general public will feel the same when the case is laid out with the new evidence and PII etc

It is a case that will catch the public interest

NOBODY wants to see someone in prison for life if the person looks like he may be innocent

I am looking forward to it jack... but had hoped it might be longer than 20 mins.  Hopefully it will be very interesting.

Offline Blodwynflower

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #67 on: March 14, 2012, 07:40:PM »
Good evening all

So is it still not confirmed that a sniffer dog actually went into the farmhouse?

Thankyou
".....when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #68 on: March 14, 2012, 07:46:PM »
Rochy if the case is referred which I believe it will be I think a full length documentary would be before the actual appeal to keep the pressure up

I wonder if it will go to judicial review, in the event of a negative CCRC refusing referral? 

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #69 on: March 14, 2012, 08:30:PM »
Keira you're right me just like hearing everything first hands is nice but I know he is convinced Jeremy is innocent

How?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #70 on: March 14, 2012, 08:35:PM »


Brilliant, Jackie, you've made my day! 

You were saying Vic and Nick....?

I think jackie is saying that he was on a provisional list of interviewees but I'm not sure she is saying he was actually interviewed? But if he truly believes in bamber's innocence I am absolutely staggered we've not heard from him before now? Despite a £1m pound reward? And I am sure he is absolutely delighted that you've set any journo worth his salt to now try and track him down for copy!!
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #71 on: March 14, 2012, 08:44:PM »
It's bang out of order that his name has been referenced on this thread in the way that it has.  Mods should remove reference to him on this thread imo.  Regardless of what he may or may not think about the case, his views are private as far as i can see. 

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #72 on: March 14, 2012, 10:47:PM »
It's bang out of order that his name has been referenced on this thread in the way that it has.  Mods should remove reference to him on this thread imo.  Regardless of what he may or may not think about the case, his views are private as far as i can see.


I think you're right, Rocky.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #73 on: March 14, 2012, 11:21:PM »
I think jackie is saying that he was on a provisional list of interviewees but I'm not sure she is saying he was actually interviewed? But if he truly believes in bamber's innocence I am absolutely staggered we've not heard from him before now? Despite a £1m pound reward? And I am sure he is absolutely delighted that you've set any journo worth his salt to now try and track him down for copy!!



People, their views and circumstances change, Vic. Nothing is static in life.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Sniffer dog
« Reply #74 on: March 14, 2012, 11:25:PM »
Nick, I'm not sure if this is a help or a hindrance, but below is a copy of a post from Mike on the SFJ almost three years ago. It mentions the dog handler a few times.

Having said that, I have no idea where this information actually originates, perhaps Mike would be able to provide an insight.


Well found, Hartley! Thank you for this.