Itemised phone bills

[tyler]

As soon as she told them , they went back and found were they were sent from , or they monitored the line after she told them ?

They monitored the line.Doesnt really help the argument does it. 

[tonyb]

Do you believe that police did not have the technology or capability to trace phone calls locally made from one phone to another back in August 1985?

Yes, or no?

Yes. But the police didn't produce itemised bills on anyone's behalf. If you admit you were incorrect in your statements on the alleged itemised bills I'm sure we can move on and you can direct your efforts in a more fruitfull direction. Itemised billing simply didn't exist in the form you state Mike,you must face this fact.

[vidvic]

Mike, this is what you posted last year.......

Reply #161 on: November 02, 2011, 10:34:PM »

    Quote

The full itemised billing for whf, and 9 Head street, are currently withheld under pii, proving that a call was made from the scene to Jeremy's cottage, during the early hours of 7th August 1985...

[mike tesko]

Mike, this is what you posted last year.......

Reply #161 on: November 02, 2011, 10:34:PM »

    Quote

The full itemised billing for whf, and 9 Head street, are currently withheld under pii, proving that a call was made from the scene to Jeremy's cottage, during the early hours of 7th August 1985...

Like I say, police obtained itemized billing for the relevant periods relating to both premises...

[mike tesko]

Police have never yet denied that they obtained itemized billing details for both the premises - if you can prove otherwise please direct me to this piece of evidence or information?

[mike tesko]

Yes. But the police didn't produce itemised bills on anyone's behalf. If you admit you were incorrect in your statements on the alleged itemised bills I'm sure we can move on and you can direct your efforts in a more fruitfull direction. Itemised billing simply didn't exist in the form you state Mike,you must face this fact.

The only person who must face facts is you...

Ask yourself why police requested billing details for the phones at whf?

Why would police be requesting something that didn't exist if it didn't exist, or relate to the phones at whf and 9 Head Street? What you are saying and what police requested and obtained are completely at odds with one another...

Do you think the police who handled this investigation were that incompetent?

[tonyb]

The only person who must face facts is you...

Ask yourself why police requested billing details for the phones at whf?

Why would police be requesting something that didn't exist if it didn't exist, or relate to the phones at whf and 9 Head Street? What you are saying and what police requested and obtained are completely at odds with one another...

Do you think the police who handled this investigation were that incompetent?

So is it phone billing details, or itemised billing?  We must get facts right. The last thing we want is a saga of two phone bills....

[vidvic]

The only person who must face facts is you...

Ask yourself why police requested billing details for the phones at whf?

Why would police be requesting something that didn't exist if it didn't exist, or relate to the phones at whf and 9 Head Street? What you are saying and what police requested and obtained are completely at odds with one another...

Do you think the police who handled this investigation were that incompetent?

Again, you have changed things.

You quite clearly told everyone that you had the itemised billing for WHF for June and July 1985 and that August's was missing, you then said "I wonder why?"....

Now either you have them or not

[tonyb]

Again, you have changed things.

You quite clearly told everyone that you had the itemised billing for WHF for June and July 1985 and that August's was missing, you then said "I wonder why?"....

Now either you have them or not

exactly. is it now billing details or itemised bills?

[vidvic]

Just to remind Mike to post the itemised bills from June and July 1985

[mike tesko]

Just to remind Mike to post the itemised bills from June and July 1985

No need to remind me, I will be posting it soon, once the CCRC makes its decision (either way)...

[mike tesko]

AH is chairman of the Conserative Monday club.  According to them he has been unwell.

Can't imagine a right wing tory going out on a limb for a convicted mass murderer unless he felt there was a strong poss of a MOJ.

Andrew Hunter is committed to trying to prove that Jeremy did not commit the murders for which he is currently convicted. I visited Andrew at his home on several occasions and shared information about this case with him, and although we have not recently been in touch with each-other I know that he is still very committed to the cause...

[tonyb]

No need to remind me, I will be posting it soon, once the CCRC makes its decision (either way)...

just in case you'd forgot Mike....
Now's the time,according to yourself,to show me to be a clown after all.... 

[vidvic]

Yes mike, you said you'd post the itemised local calls bills after the ccrc decision. Could we see them then?

[tonyb]

Yes mike, you said you'd post the itemised local calls bills after the ccrc decision. Could we see them then?

as ive said in the past, two chances....