« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'  (Read 2282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« on: February 16, 2012, 08:03:PM »
« Last Edit: February 16, 2012, 08:04:PM by rochford »
Logged

TJB65

  • Guest
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2012, 08:12:PM »
Logged

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2012, 08:15:PM »
Quote from: rochford on February 16, 2012, 08:03:PM
http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/9534751.Jeremy_Bamber____could_soon_walk_free_from_York_jail___/?ref=twtrec

The world is going to find out that the blood evidence (A, EAP BA, AK1 and HP 2-1) which helped to convict Jeremy Bamber was not found inside the silencer found by the relatives (in the gun cupboard), because that silencer was not used in her shooting (under chin) and besides, it was not sent to the lab' until a date after blood was already supposed to have been found inside it?

Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2012, 08:16:PM »
Quote from: Tracy Jayne (TJB65) on February 16, 2012, 08:12:PM
Good Stuff! xx

That aspect of the (same?) reports does not seem to have been discussed in the open.  I suspect there is more still to come also.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2012, 08:17:PM by rochford »
Logged

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2012, 08:54:PM »
The way it talks about a speck of blood sounds like the journo getting mixed up with 2002?  Also, the article wrongly describes the murders as 'shotgun'.
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2012, 10:01:PM »
I have a deep respect for Scott Lomax. But this report does not seem like the way he would word things. He is a professional writer and there are some very basic mistakes made here. I would suggest that Scott Lomax is more cautious than what he is supposed to have written here? However I hope what he appears to have written is true. Although it most certainly is not yet in the bag.
Logged

Offline Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 654
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2012, 10:44:PM »
Quote from: rochford on February 16, 2012, 08:54:PM
The way it talks about a speck of blood sounds like the journo getting mixed up with 2002?  Also, the article wrongly describes the murders as 'shotgun'.

I know what you mean Rochy. I get a bit excited when I start to read an article like this. Then they make a fundamental error such as the make of murder weapon and my heart sinks once again.

I am looking forward to the day JB gets his appeal because I hope then at last we will learn the truth about what happened that night.

I hope that if/when JB attains freedom he will not be content with just that but will continue to pursue this case until the full truth is known.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2012, 10:56:PM »
Neil is always very very cautious but he is optimistic that's a very good sign.
Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2012, 01:18:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on February 16, 2012, 10:56:PM
Neil is always very very cautious but he is optimistic that's a very good sign.

He is extremely cautious and in my personal opinion purely as a member of this forum, sets an example of how any future campaign could approach the problems inherent in interpreting or presenting the available evidence, including new discoveries etc.

There is a knack to presenting the evidence and avoiding the pitfalls.  I have said before that I would very much like to see a serious documentary maker tackle the issue from a 'rough justice' type perspective.  But in my opinion, they would need to know exactly which issues to hone in on and which pertinent questions to ask, in order to avoid the pitfalls.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2012, 01:35:PM »
Rochy that's why I listen when Ngb makes statements.

If a serious documentary were to be made I would expect the person making it would work closely with Simon especially if the documentary were pro bamber
Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2012, 02:11:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on February 17, 2012, 01:35:PM
Rochy that's why I listen when Ngb makes statements.

If a serious documentary were to be made I would expect the person making it would work closely with Simon especially if the documentary were pro bamber

Let's hope so, should any future serious look at the case be on the cards.  In the meantime, we're stuck with chokvid vs daddyscaff.  Progress is being made with the latest offing.  The opposition's 'Michael Myers' tune will take some beating though.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2012, 02:47:PM »
Rochy you are in contact with the official campaign team more than most of us do you know what's the latest news from them?
Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2012, 02:53:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on February 17, 2012, 02:47:PM
Rochy you are in contact with the official campaign team more than most of us do you know what's the latest news from them?

I only ever contacted them once Jackie.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2012, 03:24:PM »
Sorry Rochy I misunderstood  I thought you had given them some ideas and thought they might take some of them up

At the moment it just seems to be Mikes Forum talking about the case and Traceys Innocence page

Maybe Lorna Lake could comment she would know
Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Lomax in 'THE PRESS'
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2012, 07:37:PM »
Scott Lomax has just contacted me and stated that he didn't write the article. He was concerned that it was being claimed as his. He gave the reporter a few bits of information and the reporter wrote it out all incorrectly. I didn't think it was his writing.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »