Has your position changed?

[Chochokeira]

Thats what i said earlier Vic, the rifle was found on sheila with out silencer attached, so they wont look for it if they dont think it was used.

Hi Andrea,

You did say that, and I suggested that they were bound by the rule book to follow Standard scene of crime procedure: it was more than their jobs were worth to fail to comply with this. With five people dead at WHF, they would hardly commit a disciplinary offence by ignoring obligatory standard procedure, would they?

...Unless for some reason they were absolutely certain that Sheila was the murderer.

[nugnug]

if you found a blood stained silencer in a cupboard wouldn't the normal course of action be to phone the police and get them down there.

[grahameb]

But they weren't looking for a silencer and it was boxed.

Why not? The relatives were. We should perhaps ask them why they were looking for it in the first place? Also I recall the comment made by David Boutflour (in Ann Eaton's statement) who when he allegedly found it in the gun cupboard said immediately, This must be the silencer.

[grahameb]

if you found a blood stained silencer in a cupboard wouldn't the normal course of action be to phone the police and get them down there.

Which of course begs the question did they actually find it in the gun cupboard in the first place?

[Chochokeira]

Thats what i said earlier Vic, the rifle was found on sheila with out silencer attached, so they wont look for it if they dont think it was used.

It's not a question of looking for a silencer, Andrea, it's a question of doing a thorough scene of crime search. Three officers rightly regarded that gun cupboard as requiring to be searched. It's inconceivable that one of them would not have searched inside any boxes in there.

[grahameb]

It's not a question of looking for a silencer, Andrea, it's a question of doing a thorough scene of crime search. Three officers rightly regarded that gun cupboard as requiring to be searched. It's inconceivable that one of them would not have searched inside any boxes in there.

It just isn't logical is it? It is much more believable that if it had been there the police would have found it, rather that believe the relative's story of David Boultflour opening the gun cupboard door and exclaiming almost immediately, Oh look this must be the silencer to the gun. Now tell me what is the story which has common sense stamped all over it?

[gringo]

Would love to see a series of CSI Essex .

[mertol22]

If there are a few things here it perhaps these, the relatives might think i fell out a box of corn flakes, the silencer seems to enter the rather than been a part of it, like the shopkeeper in the fancy dress shop in Mr Benn presto and he appears by magic . no one would be that simple to use such a device and put it back it would be taken from the scene altogether with the rifle.

[jon]

But they weren't looking for a silencer and it was boxed.

Are they not allowed to look in boxes ? Why do you believe AE never mentioned ' silencer ' in her first statement ? Did DB call EP to tell them to come and pick a 'silencer ' up in September , like the police log show's ? Why do you believe there is at least two signed exhibit labels' with different signature's on them ? Is there a simple explanation for this Vidvic ?

[grahameb]

Would love to see a series of CSI Essex .

Now that would be a challenge fpr any producer?

[grahameb]

One undeniable fact needs to be considered. ALL  so called evidence upon which Jeremy came from all those who hated him.

[mertol22]

Would love to see a series of CSI Essex .

Do not be suprised if csi type forensics finish this once and for all, beyond the comprehension of clowns EP.

[tyler]

Do not be suprised if csi type forensics finish this once and for all, beyond the comprehension of clowns EP.

This is the thing Mertol.Jeremy pushes for every scientific test that is possible.Any one of these tests could backfire and prove his guilt and he must know this.He knows damn well that he was not there that night and did not pull that trigger!

[vidvic]

This is the thing Mertol.Jeremy pushes for every scientific test that is possible.Any one of these tests could backfire and prove his guilt and he must know this.He knows damn well that he was not there that night and did not pull that trigger!

Or, he knows something we don't?

[tyler]

Or, he knows something we don't?

Such as?