Author Topic: And so to the truth of the matter (how Sheila communicated with police)?  (Read 15120 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Roch? How do you do the 'crossed out but still readable' thing?

The buttons on the top left of your panel are Bold / Italics Underline Score

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Cheers!  :D
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
The buttons on the top left of your panel are Bold / Italics Underline Score
Oh right I'm not going to try that.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Oh right I'm not going to try that.

You just HAVE

What's the Mona Lisa button do?  I once opened it and now I have a permanent massive low res Mona Lisa on my computer screen.  Haven't got a clue how to get rid of it.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
You just HAVE

What's the Mona Lisa button do?  I once opened it and now I have a permanent massive low res Mona Lisa on my computer screen.  Haven't got a clue how to get rid of it.
;D ;D ;D You're one of those guys who when they see a button which says "don't press" immediately go and press it. If you didn't want the mona lisa why did you press it? ;D

Offline tonyb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Time to disembark the magical mystery tour...
There is already documentary evidence that within a window of opportunity between 5.25am and 6.30am, firearms officers were in conversation with someone from inside the farm, and it is also documented that the sound of a dog was heard to barking from within the farmhouse. Now, since the police were aware of the type of dog inside the farmhouse, why is it that the barking which was heard was not specifically attributed to the dog in question?

Since, at 5.25am, firearms officers were in conversion with A person from inside the farm, and there are instances of dog barking from within the same farmhouse, how can anyone prove that it was not a person making the noises that were recorded as dog barks?
So you can PROVE SC was barking like a dog then Mike? Is there EVIDENCE to PROVE the police DID NOT attribute the barking to the dog in question,otherthan hearsay or i'll post it at a future date (...)
Don't enjoy the cold weather.

Newbury1

  • Guest
So you can PROVE SC was barking like a dog then Mike? Is there EVIDENCE to PROVE the police DID NOT attribute the barking to the dog in question,otherthan hearsay or i'll post it at a future date (...)

I personally believe the barking of a dog can be attributed to a dog barking  ::), but I look forward to Mikes answer  ???

Offline tonyb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Time to disembark the magical mystery tour...
I personally believe the barking of a dog can be attributed to a dog barking  ::), but I look forward to Mikes answer  ???
Yeah,I thought it the most likely...
Don't enjoy the cold weather.

Offline Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 654
OMG They're not all locked up are they??!!
  :P

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
I personally believe the barking of a dog can be attributed to a dog barking  ::), but I look forward to Mikes answer  ???
Well I thought it to me most logical. If it can be interpreted that Sheila was barking like a dog it is equally as logical to assume that the dog was talking like Sheila. Therefore we must assume from that, that Sheila was dead at that time because it must have been the dog talking.  ....erm...

Offline Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 654
Well I thought it to me most logical. If it can be interpreted that Sheila was barking like a dog it is equally as logical to assume that the dog was talking like Sheila. Therefore we must assume from that, that Sheila was dead at that time because it must have been the dog talking.  ....erm...

LMAO  ;D

Hartley

  • Guest
Well I thought it to me most logical. If it can be interpreted that Sheila was barking like a dog it is equally as logical to assume that the dog was talking like Sheila. Therefore we must assume from that, that Sheila was dead at that time because it must have been the dog talking.  ....erm...

Sounds logical to me.  ;D

andrea

  • Guest
Bad language and obscenities were heard, was that the dog or sheila then  ;) :o

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Bad language and obscenities were heard, was that the dog or sheila then  ;) :o
Really. People will teach their dogs anything these days. ::)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
You've got to be kidding me here! Sheila barking. Now I've heard it all...  :o
Personally I think the "conversation with someone from within the farmhouse" was simply with Jeremy, and the noises heard from within the farmhouse were the dog barking.
Until I see evidence of it being other than that, I stand firm - without barking and all!