Vidvic incase you try and make out you don't read the forum I have no influence over what the official campaign team do and they have decided not to do anything to draw attention to this case with the general public.
I couldn't give a toss about your opinion of me because anyone who believes Mugford and knows about the NOTW deal has no credibility in my eyes
You or Hartley have not come up with a decent answer as to why you believe Mugford when she was previously shown to be a cunning liar
Please publish the names of the journalist s who believe Jb is guilty and their email addresses and I can see if you are telling the truth
This case is a joke a man convicted on the flimsiest of evidence to a full life sentence
Vidvic go and make up stories to someone else because 95% of people on this forum believe Mugford was telling lies and the silencer was planted
Vidvic please explain why Jeremy did not have a single mark on him after his alleged viscous fight with Neville
There was no marks on jb Because it never happened did it
Jackie, you are of course entitled to your own opinion, however if I can just pick out your point regarding Julie. You claim that she lied at the original trial, that's fair enough, but the jury decided otherwise. You then say that Julie lied during the 2002 appeal in the statements she gave, which contradict her original statements, the Appeal Judges noticed these descrepancies also, they also noticed that the bank managers statements contain some gaps, such as whether a police officer (DC Jones) was present at the bank. However, the Appeal Judges took all of this into consideration and put the descrepancies down to 16 years going by rather than witnesses lying, all of this is very clearly described and detailed in the 2002 Appeal Judgement.
So you thing she lied, the Jury, two panels of Appeal Judges, the CCRC and little old me, disagree with you, no toss involved.
