Police received screaming and ranting responses from inside farmhouse

[mike tesko]

This question is directed personally, at and to the idiot:-

What do you consider to be evidence?

[Hartley]

I am not asking for evidence , i am asking for your opinion !!

My opinion is that there is nothing which indicates that the police have lied in saying that the tapes were recorded over.

[vidvic]

Why the hell should Hartley have to give his real surname when noone else has to? If this weren't your forum then the mods should step in to stop this. Quite unfair Mike and behaviour that wouldn't be tolerated by others.

[andrea]

The idiot has disclosed his Christian name, so what is so top secret that he cannot disclose his surname. And how about a picture of himself, posted by himself, then I will consider talking to him and responding to him, properly. If he does that, I may even change my mind and start responding directly to the idiot, despite the fact that I have previously said, I wouldn't do...

If he was open and honest, I might even consider apologising for calling him an idiot?

Mike, why are you being so hostile towards Hartley? Why should he post his surname? nobody else does.

He certainly shouldnt be asked to post a picture of himself either.

[jon]

My opinion is that there is nothing which indicates that the police have lied in saying that the tapes were recorded over.

Do you believe EP lied at anytime in the ' Bamber Case ' if so where ?

[andrea]

Mike is it simply because Hartley challenges you, and asks you to provide evidence?

Hartley comes up with some great posts, you may have to accept that jeremy bamber is guilty.

[mike tesko]

Mike, why are you being so hostile towards Hartley? Why should he post his surname? nobody else does.

He certainly shouldnt be asked to post a picture of himself either.

I beg to differ, since he is making very serious allegations, which is different to offering an opinion...

[Hartley]

The idiot has disclosed his Christian name, so what is so top secret that he cannot disclose his surname. And how about a picture of himself, posted by himself, then I will consider talking to him and responding to him, properly. If he does that, I may even change my mind and start responding directly to the idiot, despite the fact that I have previously said, I wouldn't do...

If he was open and honest, I might even consider apologising for calling him an idiot?

I'm extremely open and honest, however I also maintain a certain level of privacy, which as I have stated at least twice before, is similar to 90% of the members of this forum.

There is nothing top secret about it, simply that there is also no incentive for me to offer up my surname or indeed provide you with a mug shot. The fact that my identity is unknown to you and clearly irritates the hell out of you, does nothing but amuse me.

I don't need you to respond to me, you you are anyway.

[mike tesko]

Why the hell should Hartley have to give his real surname when noone else has to? If this weren't your forum then the mods should step in to stop this. Quite unfair Mike and behaviour that wouldn't be tolerated by others.

he is making very serious allegations, as opposed to expressing an opinion...

[Hartley]

I beg to differ, since he is making very serious allegations, which is different to offering an opinion...

For the sixth time now 'Tell Tale Mike', what is this very serious allegation that you refer to?

[grahameb]

Why the hell should Hartley have to give his real surname when noone else has to? If this weren't your forum then the mods should step in to stop this. Quite unfair Mike and behaviour that wouldn't be tolerated by others.

The giving of sir names is completely up to the individual member. Although I have given my sir name I personally would not wish to force it on anyone else as there internet is a dangerous place where folk can be targeted as some of my own friends have been. Hartley has the right to withold his sir name if he so desires. As it has been pointed out many use Pseudonyms and it is their right to do so.

[tonyb]

Mike is it simply because Hartley challenges you, and asks you to provide evidence?

Hartley comes up with some great posts, you may have to accept that jeremy bamber is guilty.

NOT MAYBE, ACUALLY...

[Hartley]

This question is directed personally, at and to the idiot:-

What do you consider to be evidence?

What I consider to be evidence is something which can be substantiated and a legal professional would be able to look at it and say 'yep this would/could hold up in court'.

Mr Happy said to Mr Bump that Mr Jolly told Mr Tickle that he's innocent, on the other hand, is not what I consider to be evidence.

[mike tesko]

The idiot has not got the balls to identify himslef, even though he makes very serious allegations without any evidence to back up what he is/ has been saying, that is why I refer to him as an idiot, he hasn't got the balls to identify himself when making such false and ridiculous allegations. He knows Jeremy is innocent but will say anything to try and persuade others that he is guilty without a shred of evidence to back up what he is saying. Evidence that was relied upon to prosecute and convict Jeremy is absolutely falsified and worthless...

[tonyb]

NOT MAYBE, ACUALLY...

proven guilty that is,no amount of mudslinging is going to help the cause Mike.