Police did not only move Sheila's hand, to photograph marks on Nightdress...

[mike tesko]

Police did not only move Sheila's hand, to photograph marks on Nightdress...

Lets look at what else they moved by considering these two consecutively taken crime scene photographs:-

[mike tesko]

(1) position of arm was moved
(2) position of right hand and fingers were moved
(3) shape of bloodstain on the upper right part of the nightdress in altered
(4) hem of nightdress is altered
(5) bible

[mike tesko]

Police have only admitted to moving Sheila's right hand so that they could photograph the mark on the front right lower part of her nightdress, but they must have also moved her right arm, moved her nightdress and the rifle...

[mike tesko]

By moving her right hand to allow the police to photograph the marks on the front lower right of her nightdress, it would not have included having to move the position of the rifle, which in turn changed the position of the nightdress (in the region of the right shoulder, and at the hem), you only have to look at these two pictures to see that this was not just a case of the police moving the victims right hand to look at a mark on her nightdress beneath, the police moved many things, including the right hand, the right arm, the nightdress (above and below) and the rifle...

[mike tesko]

Then of course...

there is no explanation at all, for how and why the barrel of the rifle became resting against the left hand side of Sheila's neck?

[mike tesko]

Somebody touched Sheila's throat with bloodied fingers, before she was shot with the fatal bullet under the chin, as evidenced by the fact that blood can be seen to be running and leaking and pouring from the entry wound, over the top of the bloodied fingermarks on her neck in that region of her throat...

[mike tesko]

Why would somebody have been touching that part of Sheila's neck/throat before she was shot fatally there under the chin?

[mike tesko]

If Sheila made those bloodied fingermarks why are her hands described as being "spotlessly clean" by the police?

[grahameb]

Also the bedclothes were moved if you look. As if she was slid onto the floor over them thus causing the bloodstains on them.

[mike tesko]

Also the bedclothes were moved if you look. As if she was slid onto the floor over them thus causing the bloodstains on them.

No wonder police destroyed all the bloodstained blankets to get rid of all the evidence that Sheila had been on the bed...

[grahameb]

If the police did move the gun (as they said they did) so they could photograph the bloodstain on Sheila's nightdress. Where then is that photo of the stain on her nightdress? Because both photos are virtually the same but that her hands have been moved a bit. Where is the missing photograph?

[mike tesko]

If the police did move the gun (as they said they did) so they could photograph the bloodstain on Sheila's nightdress. Where then is that photo of the stain on her nightdress? Because both photos are virtually the same but that her hands have been moved a bit. Where is the missing photograph?

I think they are referring to this:-

But I have got a problem with this, because if you  look at the shape of the bloodstain on the upper part of the nightdress, in the second picture which shows the bloodied fingermarks on the front lower part of the nightdress, it doesn't match up with the black and white one...

Here take a look...

[mike tesko]

Look here:-

Bloodstain is more or less same shape in both pictures, but there is a view of the bloodied fingerprints in the first, but not in the second.

Which was taken first?

[mike tesko]

Now look at these:-

Bloodied fingermarks are visible in both pictures, but shape of bloodstain on nightdress is different?

[mike tesko]

We therefore have the two photographs on the same negative strip, showing Sheila's right arm and hand in different positions, and one picture not showing the bloodied fingermarks on the nightdress, whilst the other picture does, and the shape of the bloodstain on the upper right of the nightdress different in both photographs...