Some on here hide behind "false identity" when making allegations?

[mike tesko]

Some on here hide behind "false identity" when making allegations?

Some posters on the forum hide behind a false identity, when making allegations, to try to undermine what has been said, yet they are not prepared to identify themselves properly, which is a feature which should be taken into account, when evaluating what such posters say, or have said - you never know who might be making such allegations, so be very careful about listening to anyone who uses a false identity, especially when they make direct attacks on what genuine members of the forum are saying, or have said...

[mike tesko]

Why should you believe anything that is said by someone who hides behind a false identity?

[tonyb]

name and shame them Mike

[andrea]

By the same token Mike, why should we believe anything about "z" when he doesnt even exist.

[mike tesko]

name and shame them Mike

I will refrain from doing so, at the moment, but if any of them think I don't know who they are, think again, because I have information to hand as to who these individuals are. I don't mind debating anything with these people, but at least everyone knows who I am, yet these individuals hide behind a false identity, and make false allegations about genuine members...

[mike tesko]

By the same token Mike, why should we believe anything about "z" when he doesnt even exist.

Well, you and anybody else can believe anything you want to, I know that he does exist, and I am satisfied that what he has told me, is the truth as far as he is concerned. I would rather believe what he has shown and told me, than some of the stuff these members who hide behind false identities are saying (without any proof to back up what they are saying)...

Why should anyone believe what these posters who hide behind a false identity say, yet disregard what my informant has told me, or shown to me?

Seems hypocritical to me...

[andrea]

People disregard what Z says because they dont believe he exists Mike, you say you are intouch with him yet you show us no proof.

I have asked questions about Z, i wanted to know if his information has been sent to jb's legal team etc, these are the most important people where this case is concerned arent they?

I havent read anything that suggests info has been passed on, so whats the point of Z stepping forward if he isnt willing to do the right thing. Thats where the doubt about Z exists,, for me anyway.

[mike tesko]

People disregard what Z says because they dont believe he exists Mike, you say you are intouch with him yet you show us no proof.

I have asked questions about Z, i wanted to know if his information has been sent to jb's legal team etc, these are the most important people where this case is concerned arent they?

I havent read anything that suggests info has been passed on, so whats the point of Z stepping forward if he isnt willing to do the right thing. Thats where the doubt about Z exists,, for me anyway.

You believe what you want to believe, and say what you want to say, I don't have to believe anything you say, just like you don't have to believe anything I say, I'd rather know what I know about this case, and I don't particularly care whether or not no-one believes "Z" exists, I know that he does, and that's all that matters to me. You are entitled to your views like anybody else, so if it bothers you and everybody else that much you should stop thinking, or talking about him, leave it to me...

Where is your evidence, or anybody else's evidence to prove that "Z" does not exist, I await in anticipation of such evidence, if it exists, to be produced...

[grahameb]

I believe you Mike.

[andrea]

How can i possibly provide evidence that Z doesnt exist?

We dont even have a name for him except "Z", so realistically how can you expect anyone to disprove he exists.

We have to take your word for it, sorry, but i cant. Though i hope im wrong.

[andrea]

Infact Mike, the only way you can prove he exists is to let Buddy accompany you to the next meeting?

[mertol22]

Z if he exists seems will have no bearing on the coming events with the ccrc unless they know of him, what does he know that simon does not , whatever he knows why cant he pass it on to someone better qualified to use it, Jeremy Bambers destiny is on the line now Mike , sometimes its best to stare things in the eye should the ccrc refuse to refer i think thats it.

[andrea]

Z if he exists seems will have no bearing on the coming events with the ccrc unless they know of him, what does he know that simon does not , whatever he knows why cant he pass it on to someone better qualified to use it, Jeremy Bambers destiny is on the line now Mike , sometimes its best to stare things in the eye should the ccrc refuse to refer i think thats it.

I agree Mertol, thats about the size of it.

[mertol22]

I thought of something late last night a longshot , i will look up the thread rather than start a new one .

[mike tesko]

Z if he exists seems will have no bearing on the coming events with the ccrc unless they know of him, what does he know that simon does not , whatever he knows why cant he pass it on to someone better qualified to use it,  destiny is on the line now Mike , sometimes its best to stare things in the eye should the ccrc refuse to refer i think thats it.

Perhaps you might know something others do not, perhaps CCRC already know about "Z", I am not allowed to say anything further on that point, only time will tell...