This photograph had to besuppressed as part of the cover up...
Has your informant got a copy of this Mike?
He has directed me to a certain document I may have in my possession that mentions the existence of the said photograph, which took me days to find, but I finally located it last night...
Why did police take this photograph and then withhold it?
I'm surmising that EP wouldn't need to conceal a photographic record of bloody footprints under the original 4/1 investigation. Not even as part of any initial concealment regarding the circs surrounding Sheila's death (as per theorised). Because Sheila would have had to have been downstairs at some point in that 4/1 scenario anyway. And it could be portrayed that this travel to/from downstairs occurred earlier than when the raid had commenced. Photos of such footprints would only need to be concealed once the case turned to 5 murders.
Mike, have the defence sanctioned or requested a block on any uploading of schedules which refer to footprints? Is that why you have typed the text up instead?
I wonder if the police left any footprints?