Author Topic: you should all know this?  (Read 284494 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1080 on: November 15, 2011, 11:10:AM »
Masonic Link to case?:-

This came about because the principle police officers (and one relative) involved in the cover up, were Freemasons, not because it was primarily a masonic cover up...

Relative who was a Freemason, was Robert Woodwis Boutfloyur, details of police officers who were/are Freemasons to be provided, but includes ACC peter Simpson (now deceased)...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1081 on: November 15, 2011, 11:17:AM »
Love them of loathe them... Z's thread is as suspected, the top thread on the forum.  But only by replies and not by views.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=stats

'Z' is a real person, who was involved in the , the identity of 'Z' will never be revealed because I have been contacted and I receive information on a confidential basis...

Time is getting closer to date when CCRC makes its decision, and 'Z' is trying to provide information to justify sending Jeremy's  back to the court of appeal, and to safeguard the position of surviving members of the firearms team, that was forced to lie by pressure exerted upon them by senior officers...

I will confirm at this stage that my informant is male rather than female, since the only member of the firearms team who was female was WPC Julia Jeapes, and I can confirm, and do confirm, that my informant is definitely not her...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 11:21:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1082 on: November 15, 2011, 11:24:AM »
Silencer, DB/1?

You will please note, that PC Bird had recorded the seizure of exhibit bearing identifying mark of DB/1, twice in his pocketbook, which he put down to a mental abberation, which he had in September 1985...


Oh yeah...

And pigs can fly...


 It is too much of a coincidence, for PC Bird, to record the taking of exhibit DB/1 twice, at a time when relatives found the second silencer at whf on 11th September 1985...

Please...

No jokes about " The flying squad"...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1083 on: November 15, 2011, 11:30:AM »
Love them of loathe them... Z's thread is as suspected, the top thread on the forum.  But only by replies and not by views.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=stats

'Z' is a real person, who was involved in the , the identity of 'Z' will never be revealed because I have been contacted and I receive information on a confidential basis...

Time is getting closer to date when CCRC makes its decision, and 'Z' is trying to provide information to justify sending Jeremy's  back to the court of appeal, and to safeguard the position of surviving members of the firearms team, that was forced to lie by pressure exerted upon them by senior officers...

I will confirm at this stage that my informant is male rather than female, since the only member of the firearms team who was female was WPC Julia Jeapes, and I can confirm, and do confirm, that my informant is definitely not her...

Interesting Mike.  I've got my doubts about the CCRC.   Transgressing somewhat, I've just seen this on Bambertweet twitpics  about the land deal (not sure if this document is on the forum already)...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 11:38:AM by rochford »

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1084 on: November 15, 2011, 11:36:AM »
Consider this:- The ballistic expert, Malcolm Fletcher, has gone on record as saying that bullet PV/20, was Whole in appearance, yet according to lab' records, made in his handwriting, dated, 9th October 1985, he accepts that PV/20, was three large plus number of small possible bullet type fragments (117) in the right side of her neck?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1085 on: November 15, 2011, 11:39:AM »
How can he go on to describe bullet PV/20 as a whole bullet, in view of his own findings, relating to the same (PV/20), 0n 9th October 1985?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1086 on: November 15, 2011, 11:42:AM »
My apologies...

That last doc related to the land deal.  This one, also pinched from Bambertweets twitpics, is allegedly linked to the 1996 destruction of evidence...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1087 on: November 15, 2011, 11:43:AM »
How can he go on to describe bullet PV/20 as a whole bullet, in view of his own findings, relating to the same (PV/20), 0n 9th October 1985?

Clearly, based upon his own conclusions and findings on 9th October 1985, bullet PV/20 was not whole, but rather was a fragmented bullet, which had broken into three main pieces and several other small pieces...

Do Essex police and the DPP think we are all fucking thick, or what?

What a load of utter of bollocks, and bunkum...

 Either it was a fragmented bullet, (PV/20), which had broken into three main parts plus several pieces, or it was a whole bullet...

It can't have been both...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 11:47:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1088 on: November 15, 2011, 11:49:AM »
Do Essex police, the DPP, and this expert witness, (Malcom Fletcher), think we are thick, or what?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1089 on: November 15, 2011, 11:58:AM »
Mike, do you know anything about John Soames - Special Branch? 

Re your question about these people thinking we are thick.  They have got away with it so far haven't they?  And if the CCRC refuse to refer on Dec 9th then they will continue to get away with it also.  So maybe it's not so much that they think we are thick.  Maybe it's just that they can rely on public interest not having yet reached critical mass.  And maybe they also feel some security in the knowledge of the brazened lengths already entered in to, in order cover up this scandal.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 11:59:AM by rochford »

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1090 on: November 15, 2011, 12:26:PM »
Mike, do you know anything about John Soames - Special Branch? 

Re your question about these people thinking we are thick.  They have got away with it so far haven't they?  And if the CCRC refuse to refer on Dec 9th then they will continue to get away with it also.  So maybe it's not so much that they think we are thick.  Maybe it's just that they can rely on public interest not having yet reached critical mass.  And maybe they also feel some security in the knowledge of the brazened lengths already entered in to, in order cover up this scandal.

Only that he is/was a colleague of PS WOODCOCK, who I am reliably informed was responsible for handling the rifle, which fired the fatal shot, that killed Sheila in the bedroom...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1091 on: November 15, 2011, 12:30:PM »
Cat is out of the bag, who actually fired the shot, that killed Sheila Caffell, in the bedroom at whf:-

It was none other than "PS Paul WOODCOCK"... (accidentally)

Paul WOODCOCK fired the shot which killed Sheila in the bedroom (ACCORDING TO MY INFORMANT)...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 12:31:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1092 on: November 15, 2011, 12:33:PM »
Cat is out of the bag, who actually fired the shot, that killed Sheila Caffell, in the bedroom at whf:-

It was none other than "PS Paul WOODCOCK"... (accidentally)

Paul WOODCOCK fired the shot which killed Sheila in the bedroom (ACCORDING TO MY INFORMANT)...

By my own reckoning he was my number one prime suspect as to who fired the shot....now how did I know that....how did I work it out and come to that conclusion.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1093 on: November 15, 2011, 01:00:PM »
Cat is out of the bag, who actually fired the shot, that killed Sheila Caffell, in the bedroom at whf:-

It was none other than "PS Paul WOODCOCK"... (accidentally)

Paul WOODCOCK fired the shot which killed Sheila in the bedroom (ACCORDING TO MY INFORMANT)...

By my own reckoning he was my number one prime suspect as to who fired the shot....now how did I know that....how did I work it out and come to that conclusion.

Smiffy...

You are onto it...

If PI Montgomery removed the rifle from Sheila's body, (According to PI Montgomery's, and DI COOKS, statement) how could, PS Woodcock, be responsible for doing the same thing, later...

« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 01:02:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: you should all know this?
« Reply #1094 on: November 15, 2011, 01:03:PM »
Mike, sorry to ask again.  But do you know anything about John Soames (Special Branch) and his role in ordering the destruction of exhibits in 1996?

Yes, I Have copy documents relating to this...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 01:07:PM by mike tesko »