you should all know this?

[chochokeira]

Mike,

I must sheepishly admit that I did wonder for a time if you and Smiffy were the same person - because you are both so astonishingly knowledgeable in respect of this case. However, I've changed my mind because:

1.  You both post simultaneously.

2.  There are distinct differences in your sentence construction and respective use of grammar.

3.  You disagree with each other at times and I can't see you establishing a forum alter ego and using this to undermine your own credibility.

4.  Hartley believes you're Smiffy. As Hartley's wrong on everything else, his support for this view is sufficient in itself to make me question it.

5.  One of Hartley's absurd reasons: following weeks of appalling rudeness, provocation and smears on your character by Hartley, you finally responded as any normal human being would do, got mad and smited him!  What planet is the man on!

6.  I've been watching  'Who's online' a lot during the past week or two and I have not seen you smite anyone at any time.

7.  For Hartley, who set up the false identity, Steve, to accuse you of doing the same is mighty rich and grossly hypocritical. 

8.  Hartley is a classic case of paranoid projection: he projects his faults onto others whom he even blames for these. Perhaps we should send him to Dr Ferguson jnr?

[OnceSaid]

Quote from Bob: As I understand it Mike/Smiffy, this is what you now want us to believe...

It is about time that this suggestion that Mike Tesko and Smiffy are the same person is laid to rest.  They are not the same person, and I am not saying that simply because they use a different IP address and are sometimes online at the same time.  This suggestion originates with John Lamberton and it has been repeated so many times elswhere and recently here that some people are starting to believe it.  Do not believe it, because it is nonsense designed to taunt forum members.  I am addressing this to those who are pro Bamber as much as to those who are against or are undecided.

This is exactly what John Lamberton done on other forums that he frequented to cause disruption.  He accused another site owner of being Smiffy and went from one forum to the next repeating it, till eventually other posters were doing the same.  It is only now after many many months, that these people  have realised they were fooled when they see or have been told that further accusations have been made by John Lamberton that Mike Tesco is Smiffy.  Unfortunately much damage has been done by then and now due to his deliberate and malicious accusation. 

[mike tesko]

Mike,

I must sheepishly admit that I did wonder for a time if you and Smiffy were the same person - because you are both so astonishingly knowledgeable in respect of this case. However, I've changed my mind because:

1.  You both post simultaneously.

2.  There are distinct differences in your sentence construction and respective use of grammar.

3.  You disagree with each other at times and I can't see you establishing a forum alter ego and using this to undermine your own credibility.

4.  Hartley believes you're Smiffy. As Hartley's wrong on everything else, his support for this view is sufficient in itself to make me question it.

5.  One of Hartley's absurd reasons: following weeks of appalling rudeness, provocation and smears on your character by Hartley, you finally responded as any normal human being would do, got mad and smited him!  What planet is the man on!

6.  I've been watching  'Who's online' a lot during the past week or two and I have not seen you smite anyone at any time.

7.  For Hartley, who set up the false identity, Steve, to accuse you of doing the same is mighty rich and grossly hypocritical. 

8.  Hartley is a classic case of paranoid projection: he blames others for his own faults. Perhaps we should send him to Dr Ferguson jnr?

Or perhaps he could get an appointment to see the illusive DR Harris ?

[jackiepreece]

Keira
 

[smiffy]

Check my posts on here if people want.
I state I have posted as Outsider on the wrongly accused person forum... easy to check..
I was on that long before joining this forum.
Obviously my posting style will be basically the same as when using smiffy on here or outsider on the WAP forum...
clearly I am not Mike.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hammersley in court claimed about the 2 bullet cases found near to Sheila that one was found one side of her and the other was on the other side of her. He also claims to have logged and collected as found.
The sequence of these two bullet cases is that they were found first of all prior to the body being moved.
One is described as lying between the bible and a slipper and is supposedly photographed.
Oddly no slipper appears in any long distance shots of that part of the bedroom...was Hammersley misidentifying socks for slippers? most strange.

However in Woodcock's statement he claims he saw the two bullet cases that were found close to Sheila only when her body had been removed and that they were lying on the floor between her body and the bed.

Clearly the 2 accounts contradict each other and the errors are not of a type in which it could be passed off as a simple mistake. Something is very wrong and at least one account is a fabrication if not both of them at least on this issue.

[mike tesko]

I have been asked to post the trial transcript of DI Cook, DS Davidson and PC bird for the purpose of completeness, since it will enable everyone to see the bigger picture. Once you see what all the SOCO are saying, it become Crystal clear that there accounts of what took place does not. Add up or tie in...

[chochokeira]

Mike,

I must sheepishly admit that I did wonder for a time if you and Smiffy were the same person - because you are both so astonishingly knowledgeable in respect of this case. However, I've changed my mind because:

1.  You both post simultaneously.

2.  There are distinct differences in your sentence construction and respective use of grammar.

3.  You disagree with each other at times and I can't see you establishing a forum alter ego and using this to undermine your own credibility.

4.  Hartley believes you're Smiffy. As Hartley's wrong on everything else, his support for this view is sufficient in itself to make me question it.

5.  One of Hartley's absurd reasons: following weeks of appalling rudeness, provocation and smears on your character by Hartley, you finally responded as any normal human being would do, got mad and smited him!  What planet is the man on!

6.  I've been watching  'Who's online' a lot during the past week or two and I have not seen you smite anyone at any time.

7.  For Hartley, who set up the false identity, Steve, to accuse you of doing the same is mighty rich and grossly hypocritical. 

8.  Hartley is a classic case of paranoid projection: he blames others for his own faults. Perhaps we should send him to Dr Ferguson jnr?

Or perhaps he could get an appointment to see the illusive DR Harris ?

Great idea, ask him to cure Hartley's compulsive smiting at the same time. He just smited me again 

[mike tesko]

Three different police officers moved rifle off body, when once should have sufficed ...

[mike tesko]

I know that Sheila was photographed on the bed at a time when she was still alive. And only had one wound to her neck. I also know that she was shot under the chin for a second time whIst she was  still on the bed, before her body was moved to the floor...

[clifford]

I. Know that Sheila was photographed on the bed at a time when she was still alive. And only had one wound to her neck. I also know that she was shot under the chin for a second time whIst she was  still on the bed, before her body was moved to the floor...

I have believed in Jeromy's innocence for a long time now, but I am troubled by Mikes posts.
I can not get my head around that the police fired the fatal shot.
I can see no reason for this.
I am not about to change my mind, but mikes take on this is beyond me.
Z does nothing for me, as I still feel stung by Ali Bongo, so I am very cautious.
If mike is taking the piss again, then I will leave the forum.
I have been thinking about Z for some time now, and I could make these statements as it is available on this sight. No problems there then.
Us pro Bambers will listen to any misinformation, and trust in mike, but it does not do it for me.
After 26 years Z decides enough is enough, and is going to spill his guts. Why?
He has the power of EP behind him. He could of collected a million quid a few years back, so why do it for nothing. I have yet to meet a copper with a coinciance

[clifford]

sorry for my crap spelling.

[mertol22]

I. Know that Sheila was photographed on the bed at a time when she was still alive. And only had one wound to her neck. I also know that she was shot under the chin for a second time whIst she was  still on the bed, before her body was moved to the floor...

I have believed in Jeromy's innocence for a long time now, but I am troubled by Mikes posts.
I can not get my head around that the police fired the fatal shot.
I can see no reason for this.
I am not about to change my mind, but mikes take on this is beyond me.
Z does nothing for me, as I still feel stung by Ali Bongo, so I am very cautious.
If mike is taking the piss again, then I will leave the forum.
I have been thinking about Z for some time now, and I could make these statements as it is available on this sight. No problems there then.
Us pro Bambers will listen to any misinformation, and trust in mike, but it does not do it for me.
After 26 years Z decides enough is enough, and is going to spill his guts. Why?
He has the power of EP behind him. He could of collected a million quid a few years back, so why do it for nothing. I have yet to meet a copper with a coinciance

  If Z exists  he will not be alone there will be others, no one person could  have such information.

[clifford]

This thread is bollocks, and cannot be sugbstanciated, Spelling crap again. Sorry.

[clifford]

I. Know that Sheila was photographed on the bed at a time when she was still alive. And only had one wound to her neck. I also know that she was shot under the chin for a second time whIst she was  still on the bed, before her body was moved to the floor...

I have believed in Jeromy's innocence for a long time now, but I am troubled by Mikes posts.
I can not get my head around that the police fired the fatal shot.
I can see no reason for this.
I am not about to change my mind, but mikes take on this is beyond me.
Z does nothing for me, as I still feel stung by Ali Bongo, so I am very cautious.
If mike is taking the piss again, then I will leave the forum.
I have been thinking about Z for some time now, and I could make these statements as it is available on this sight. No problems there then.
Us pro Bambers will listen to any misinformation, and trust in mike, but it does not do it for me.
After 26 years Z decides enough is enough, and is going to spill his guts. Why?
He has the power of EP behind him. He could of collected a million quid a few years back, so why do it for nothing. I have yet to meet a copper with a coinciance

  If Z exists  he will not be alone there will be others, no one person could  have such information.

Z does not exist, he is a figment of Mikes imagination.

[clifford]

Mike,

I must sheepishly admit that I did wonder for a time if you and Smiffy were the same person - because you are both so astonishingly knowledgeable in respect of this case. However, I've changed my mind because:

1.  You both post simultaneously.

2.  There are distinct differences in your sentence construction and respective use of grammar.

3.  You disagree with each other at times and I can't see you establishing a forum alter ego and using this to undermine your own credibility.

4.  Hartley believes you're Smiffy. As Hartley's wrong on everything else, his support for this view is sufficient in itself to make me question it.

5.  One of Hartley's absurd reasons: following weeks of appalling rudeness, provocation and smears on your character by Hartley, you finally responded as any normal human being would do, got mad and smited him!  What planet is the man on!

6.  I've been watching  'Who's online' a lot during the past week or two and I have not seen you smite anyone at any time.

7.  For Hartley, who set up the false identity, Steve, to accuse you of doing the same is mighty rich and grossly hypocritical. 

8.  Hartley is a classic case of paranoid projection: he projects his faults onto others whom he even blames for these. Perhaps we should send him to Dr Ferguson jnr?

Keira, you can post on an i phone with no problems.