Jeremys Good News

[Roch]

His solicitors have been ignored, given the runaround and mocked in turns.  One may have done some kind of deal behind his back to view crucial photographic evidence, that should never have been concealed in the first place.  It's a disgrace and makes me angry.  Let's see whether Simon is going to be ignored, or given the runaround?  And if he's not, please ask your self these questions. 

Why should it matter which solicitor Jeremy Bamber has?
 
Why does the law only apply if Jeremy Bamber has a top notch solicitor? 

Why is something only released now when it could have been released many many years ago? 

WHY WAS IT EVER CONCEALED IN THE FIRST PLACE?

How is it in the public interest to conceal such information and evidence? 

Is it in your interest? 

I have examined this issue in my mind and I cannot see how it is in my interest.  Or the next door neighbours or my work colleagues or the bloke who props up the bar in my local (not me, the other one).

So WHO'S interest was it in... to conceal all this stuff? 

Is Simon McKay also part of Bamber's manipulative conspiracy to pretend loads of evidence and documents have been withheld? 

Honestly, some people need to wake up. (IMO).

[chochokeira]

His solicitors have been ignored, given the runaround and mocked in turns.  One may have done some kind of deal behind his back to view crucial photographic evidence, that should never have been concealed in the first place.  It's a disgrace and makes me angry.  Let's see whether Simon is going to be ignored, or given the runaround?  And if he's not, please ask your self these questions. 

Why should it matter which solicitor Jeremy Bamber has?
 
Why does the law only apply if Jeremy Bamber has a top notch solicitor? 

Why is something only released now when it could have been released many many years ago? 

WHY WAS IT EVER CONCEALED IN THE FIRST PLACE?

How is it in the public interest to conceal such information and evidence? 

Is it in your interest? 

I have examined this issue in my mind and I cannot see how it is in my interest.  Or the next door neighbours or my work colleagues or the bloke who props up the bar in my local (not me, the other one).

So WHO'S interest was it in... to conceal all this stuff? 

Is Simon McKay also part of Bamber's manipulative conspiracy to pretend loads of evidence and documents have been withheld? 

Honestly, some people need to wake up. (IMO).

Well said, Rocky! +1

[grahameb]

Why should it matter which solicitor Jeremy Bamber has?
 
Why does the law only apply if Jeremy Bamber has a top notch solicitor? 

Probably because (1) he has top notch connections and this advantage must be taken into consideration. (2) Probably because he is a good bloke.
Unfortunately because of the character of the world and the fact that people take more notice of big named legal bods than not so well known ones I should think that such a well known legal man will cut the mustard with these habitually deaf CCRC.
Also it must also be made known that ngb has been doing a great deal of work for Jeremy unknown to many people here. In this way he has helped Jeremy collate and put in order many things for Jeremy so that he can present to the CCRC an intelligent and crystallised case.
So I think that it is essential to have the best legal minds on his case. Let's face it 26 years of solicitors have not made much difference to him. Let us hope that these dedicated guys he has now especially ngb will at last act as a lever to our crackpot legal system?

[tyler]

If Mckay had the bottle to out the Mp's,then he surely wont be phased in outing Essex Police and anyone else involved in fitting Jeremy up.Me thinks that heads are gonna roll pretty soon.Am so pleased for JB.

And a very big well deserved pat on the back to Jackie for making it happen!

[mertol22]

The basis of Law is and always be reason, reason of doubht, and on this forum you can take your pick.

[SUMMER]

Great news Jackie!
Maybe things will get a move on now for Jeremy!

[Roch]

Why should it matter which solicitor Jeremy Bamber has?
 
Why does the law only apply if Jeremy Bamber has a top notch solicitor? 

Probably because (1) he has top notch connections and this advantage must be taken into consideration. (2) Probably because he is a good bloke.
Unfortunately because of the character of the world and the fact that people take more notice of big named legal bods than not so well known ones I should think that such a well known legal man will cut the mustard with these habitually deaf CCRC.
Also it must also be made known that ngb has been doing a great deal of work for Jeremy unknown to many people here. In this way he has helped Jeremy collate and put in order many things for Jeremy so that he can present to the CCRC an intelligent and crystallised case.
So I think that it is essential to have the best legal minds on his case. Let's face it 26 years of solicitors have not made much difference to him. Let us hope that these dedicated guys he has now especially ngb will at last act as a lever to our crackpot legal system?

Thank you Grahame.  I can see the points you are making.  But if something is withheld, then it is withheld  no matter which solicitor is in position.  And if there are an astounding number of anomalies in a case, then those anomalies exist regardless of which solicitor is in place. 

I cant help getting the feeling that Mr. Rivlin was simply out of his depth when representing Jeremy at trial.  I am unsure about PT the solicitor, in terms of how well he performed but it cannot have been great.  It has been said on here that Rivlin was a prosecution barrister and that Jeremy Bamber was his first defence case.  I wish Jeremy bamber had obtained the services of an experienced defence barrister.  I think such barrister might have smashed right through the prosecution's case. 

[jackiepreece]

I have listed below a few of Simons posts on twitter which give an insight into the person.
I agree with Grahame about Ngb and the help he has given Jeremy he has been unbelievable and everyone loves him.  Jeremy must have two of the nicest people in the legal profession helping him right now



 @simonmckay has to go to the rugby. Not Wales v France but a little known game in N Yorkshire at which his fine 12 year old boy is playing... 
__________________________


If any other person bound by the OSA was found to have "blurred the line" of duty and friendship, they'd have been arrested. Why not Fox?

 @simonmckay Ordinary individuals get arrested, often dramatically, where there is even a suggestion there has been a breach of the OSA. Why not Fox? 

 @simonmckay He was Secretary of State for Defence and invited his friend to official meetings and functions! That's reasonable grounds to suspect alone 

@simonmckay The most pernicious aspect of this is its effect: that our elected officials consider there is one rule for them and another for the people 
__________________________


 @simonmckay After reading thousands of pages of depositions from the States, I've caught the witness in a catalogue of lies. The truth always endures... 
__________________________

@simonmckay "Where after all do human rights begin? In small places,  so small they do not appear on any map of the world". E Roosevelt

_______________________________

Lawyers and anyone interested in human rights generally may wish to follow the exceptional Hugh Southy QC@HumanRightsQC
9 October 2011 09:17:56
by simonmckay

9 October 2011 12:18:11 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®
@simonmckay I am genuinely lost for words at such kind words from someone whose tweets are extraordinarily informative.
9 October 2011 12:03:40
by HumanRightsQC


@HumanRightsQC my pleasure Hugh

_______________________________

 @simonmckay "You cannot wish them to expiate their crimes with their lives - you cannot desire that they should be hanged..." Sir William Garrow, 1813 

__________________________

@simonmckay reading Smith & Hogans Crim Law,noticed your name as a reviewer, David Ormerod writes so well. u still ok to blog for me Simon?


5 October 2011 10:23:48  @simonmckay @legalacademia David O is great; we wrote a piece for Crim LR a few years ago and I reviewed a couple of chapters on his first Smith & Hogan 

5 October 2011 09:23:35 

 @simonmckay @legalacademia will get something to you soon for the blog 
@simonmckay I'd like to meet him,a lot of my work gives credit to his thought process on crim law. OK,will sit tight for the blog, thank you
5 October 2011 10:15:52
by legalacademia


@legalacademia I used to do the odd lecture with him but he does much less now he's a Law Commissioner. Will introduce you some time
__________________________

5 October 2011 10:23:48  

 @simonmckay is delivering a lecture today to a range of police officers on planning a covert policing operation that will withstand legal challenge 

@CrimeCounsel I give them the mckay-law-matrix: a venn diagram on methodology they can carry with them as a reminder of our time together

4 October 2011 06:40:15 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®
@simonmckay You're telling them the rules? It will be revelatory - and then forgotten.
4 October 2011 06:35:11
by CrimeCounsel


__________________________

@simonmckay As America embraces a free Amanda Knox, I hope it hangs its head in shame that it does so in the shadow of Troy Davis' execution last month 

Knox appeal judgment todayhttp://t.co/QrJ5wo6C


10 minutes to judgment in #knoxcase: live on sky news

3 October 2011 20:21:39 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay live and better on BBC News
3 October 2011 20:25:09
by BBCDanielS

@BBCDanielS yes, of course, with the advantage of Mr Sandford's perceptive analysis - he knows how to cover a miscarriage of justice

3 October 2011 20:27:19 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

 @simonmckay Justice is so rare it can seem at times as if a rumour of a thing of the past. Tonight its presence can be felt: the commonality of law 
@simonmckay If the conviction is quashed the Italian system should celebrated:as Atticus Finch said justice is not an ideal but a living working reality 

@simonmckay She wins: a great day for justice 

@simonmckay The only thing more incredible than the verdict is the dignity of the Kercher family 

@Bambertweets @EddieGilfoyleI hope the Knox case is your prelude

3 October 2011 21:01:30 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®


@CrimeCounsel sure but remember someone has been convicted and who as far as I'm aware is not appealing. I think a bold but correct decision

3 October 2011 21:03:34 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay But the court said they did not commit the offence... Couldn't they have just said not sure?

3 October 2011 21:01:09
by CrimeCounsel

Sollecito's father could not have acted with more humanity or given more to his son's cause

3 October 2011 21:09:01 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®


@simonmckay Time I hope to put the flawed investigation on trial: the Kercher family are entitled to answers 


@fieldproducer@KeirSimmonsITV their legal insights have been pretty poor - thought the Murray commentary this evening was woeful

3 October 2011 21:22:02 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@KeirSimmonsITV it wasn't just tweeting news orgs also ran the wrong line

3 October 2011 21:19:48
by fieldproducer

Perhaps we all ought to talk about that fact that Twitter seems to have failed tonight - mass tweeting of wrong verdict in Knox case.
3 October 2011 21:17:12
by KeirSimmonsITV


 @simonmckay Fascinated that justice traverses continents; when it uncommonly puts in an appearance it speaks a universal language 

__________________________


Shocking advocacy by the prosecutor at the opening of the Michael Jackson homicide trial

@legalacademia yes, judge permitted cameras in - good illustration of how not to open a case

27 September 2011 18:02:06 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay is this televised?#haveImissedatrick

27 September 2011 17:57:28
by legalacademia


Prosecutor uses power point slides with watermark of Michael Jackson's corpse. Novel concept of prosecutorial independence


RT @simonmckay How is the jury supposed to follow the medical jargon the prosecutor is spewing out. This is dreadful stuff 


@TooManyBlueys this is for real

27 September 2011 18:37:18 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay are you joking? Is this a spoof?

27 September 2011 18:24:04
by TooManyBlueys


@oldlawyer1 I can't believe it

27 September 2011 18:37:37 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay beyond belief! ethics?
27 September 2011 18:24:44
by oldlawyer1


@bhamiltonbruce quite unbelievable

27 September 2011 18:38:02 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay that's an 'interesting' technique - keeps jury focused on victim?

27 September 2011 18:25:36
by bhamiltonbruce


@Robert_HM extraordinary!

27 September 2011 18:38:24 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay I noticed and thought "sick"
27 September 2011 18:30:27
by Robert_HM


Defence rely on a cardboard sign to capture the essential questions which appear to have little to do with the ingredients of the offence

 @simonmckay The prosecution has been out done by the woeful defence. Its difficult to comprehend this is a manslaughter trial and in the public eye. 

@MTPT unless more appetite there than here, a hiding to nothing

27 September 2011 19:24:30 
from Twitter for BlackBerry®

@simonmckay Laying foundation for appeal on grounds of incompetent defence?

27 September 2011 19:21:12
by MTPT

 @simonmckay Murray has seemingly genuine tearful moment which may save him from his lawyer (or possibly as a result of his dreadful opening) 

[grahameb]

I see he mentions Garrow? I liked watching Garrow's law.

[Roch]

I see he mentions Garrow? I liked watching Garrow's law.

Love owt like that me.  I'm a right History dork.

[OnceSaid]

Great news. Thanks for sharing.

[jackiepreece]

I just need to put something right which I heard from Jeremy himself today.

John the loser is putting it out there on certain sites that Jeremy was in trouble because he had been dumped by his solicitors.

Totally untrue as Jeremys current solicitor is still carrying out work for him and they have a good relationship

I think everyone is aware what a mammoth task Simon has taken on additionally and how much help he can be over PII issues

At the moment Jeremy is being given evidence all the time which he has never seen before.  He is getting so much he is finding it hard to keep up with it.

Jeremy is so happy and positive that he now has Simon representing him and he is confident with a lot of hard work getting all the evidence together all the secrets about this case will soon be revealed and his
conviction will be overturned

[chochokeira]

I just need to put something right which I heard from Jeremy himself today.

John the loser is putting it out there on certain sites that Jeremy was in trouble because he had been dumped by his solicitors.

Totally untrue as Jeremys current solicitor is still carrying out work for him and they have a good relationship

I think everyone is aware what a mammoth task Simon has taken on additionally and how much help he can be over PII issues

At the moment Jeremy is being given evidence all the time which he has never seen before.  He is getting so much he is finding it hard to keep up with it.

Jeremy is so happy and positive that he now has Simon representing him and he is confident with a lot of hard work getting all the evidence together all the secrets about this case will soon be revealed and his
conviction will be overturned

That's such good news, Jackie, well done to you for bringing Simon McKay into the fight for Jeremy's Appeal. +1

[grahameb]

I just need to put something right which I heard from Jeremy himself today.

John the loser is putting it out there on certain sites that Jeremy was in trouble because he had been dumped by his solicitors.

This man thrives on telling lies. Those who still listen to and believe his lies can be described in three words. "DUPES AND FOOLS"

[shonapugs]

After only having the help and support of Mike to help Jeremy when he had nobody else and then to have the help and support of Ngb just unbeleivably brilliant to now having the equally brilliant Simon McKay as Jeremys new solicitor

Which part of new solicitor don't you understand muppet?

Woh!! How long do you think you've got? Troll-dispersal record, 2 minutes. Knock yourself out!!