Police action report 273, finding of silencer, and contacting Anthony Pargeter?

[mike tesko]

Police action report 273, finding of silencer, and contacting Anthony Pargeter?

"take statement David Boutflour re phoning his cousin Anthony Pargeter re finding silencer, appears discrepancies in above statement"...

Allocated to DC Thomerson, at 1830hrs, on 7th October 1985...

Statement taken and attached. Did speak to Anthony Pargeter on phone re finding silencer...

[smiffy]

Makes one wonder about this alleged call.

Pargetter knew he had left his own rifle and silencer at whf.  He should have therefore been under the belief that there could be 2 silencers at whf unless  he had formed the view or knew it to be murder and that it was possible that the killer/s had taken one or both the silencers away from whf.

How likely is it that the police would tell Pargetter , the Eatons and the Boutflours all about what they found in the way of rifles, silencers etc? What is more even if such strange info was given to those people (if so they have lied about it) that they had say one silencer..then unless viewed by Pargetter he would be unable to confirm it was his or the Bambers silencer that they were in possesion of ..unless again there was an old identifying feature on his silencer (such as a deep scratch or other damage).

I feel sure the police will not admit to stating that they gave these people lots of information early on prior to the 10th of august...thats if in fact they gave out such information in the first place.

Now if Pargetter kept it quiet from the Boutflours and Eatons that his rifle and silencer had been at whf on the night in question then they would be unaware that the claimed "found" silencer could be Pargetter's one. So providing the police had not said anything to the relatives (they certainly didnt to JB) then Pargetter would know such a silencer could have been his and not just the Bamber's one.

So just how can the relatives be so sure (unless fully informed by the police on such matters) that this silencer allegedly found on the 10th was the Bamber one. Certainly Pargetter could not be in such a position unless he knew more.

So going along with these dodgy stories. The relatives know for sure it is the Bamber silencer and not the Pargetter silencer raises the question as to how.If it was murder and the killer/s took away from the scene the Bamber silencer and left the Pargetter silencer behind and later on when visiting whf see the police had taken the Pargetter silencer they knew to be there then the killers would know the silencer the police did not have was the one they had in their possesion and that it was the Bamber silencer.

Now this silencer finding story on the 10th august seems so dodgy its unbelievable so questions whether it was ever found at all...and as to whether it had been with the relatives all along.

So unless the police admit to informing the relatives etc and/or the relatives admit fully that the claimed silencer finding on the 10th august was bogus then the relatives own story suggests they were involved in the whf murders themselves.