Further extension of time for response to CCRC

[ngb1066]

It has been announced by the CCRC that they have granted a further extension of time for Jeremy Bamber to make submissions to the CCRC in response to their provisional statement of reasons for refusing to refer the case to the Court of Appeal.  The extension of time is to permit some further analysis to be undertaken on behalf of the defence.

In view of this it is likely to be several months before the CCRC announce their final decision.

[Steve A]

Another one.

BBC Article here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-14762107

[slaters]

In a statement, the CCRC said: "Mr Bamber's legal team has very recently suggested that an additional line of enquiry should be pursued.

"In the interests of completeness, we have agreed in principle to explore the potential for the further work suggested and have extended the deadline for submissions in order to facilitate this.

What might the additional line of enquiry be?

[grahameb]

It has been announced by the CCRC that they have granted a further extension of time for Jeremy Bamber to make submissions to the CCRC in response to their provisional statement of reasons for refusing to refer the case to the Court of Appeal.  The extension of time is to permit some further analysis to be undertaken on behalf of the defence.

In view of this it is likely to be several months before the CCRC announce their final decision.

Mor time? At this rate they might as well give him an extention of a life term in prison.

[ngb1066]

In a statement, the CCRC said: "Mr Bamber's legal team has very recently suggested that an additional line of enquiry should be pursued.

"In the interests of completeness, we have agreed in principle to explore the potential for the further work suggested and have extended the deadline for submissions in order to facilitate this.

What might the additional line of enquiry be?

It is misleading of the CCRC to say that this line of enquiry has been "recently suggested" as the recent request only repeated requests made several times over the past few years by Jeremy Bamber.  Although the nature of the line of enquiry has not yet been publicly disclosed I do not think it can do any harm for me to reveal that it relates to the logs.



 

[Roch]

In a statement, the CCRC said: "Mr Bamber's legal team has very recently suggested that an additional line of enquiry should be pursued.

"In the interests of completeness, we have agreed in principle to explore the potential for the further work suggested and have extended the deadline for submissions in order to facilitate this.

What might the additional line of enquiry be?

It is misleading of the CCRC to say that this line of enquiry has been "recently suggested" as the recent request only repeated requests made several times over the past few years by Jeremy Bamber.  Although the nature of the line of enquiry has not yet been publicly disclosed I do not think it can do any harm for me to reveal that it relates to the logs.



 

Not these logs by any chance?  http://youtu.be/8OOC8bmzg7Q?hd=1
                                                                                 

[ngb1066]

In a statement, the CCRC said: "Mr Bamber's legal team has very recently suggested that an additional line of enquiry should be pursued.

"In the interests of completeness, we have agreed in principle to explore the potential for the further work suggested and have extended the deadline for submissions in order to facilitate this.

What might the additional line of enquiry be?

It is misleading of the CCRC to say that this line of enquiry has been "recently suggested" as the recent request only repeated requests made several times over the past few years by Jeremy Bamber.  Although the nature of the line of enquiry has not yet been publicly disclosed I do not think it can do any harm for me to reveal that it relates to the logs.



 

Not these logs by any chance?  http://youtu.be/8OOC8bmzg7Q?hd=1
                                                                                 

The very ones!

[Alias]

Well, I suppose it is for the best. I sincerely hope Jeremy has a fair chance this time around.

[grahameb]

Well, I suppose it is for the best. I sincerely hope Jeremy has a fair chance this time around.

Probably be 95 years old when it does come whe all the guilty ones are dead. Then thewy'll realise it was a fit up?

[Steve A]

Are these extensions requested by the defence or delaying tactics by the ccrc?

[OnceSaid]

Are these extensions requested by the defence or delaying tactics by the ccrc?

I would say delaying tactics by the ccrc.  They have form for it. 

[ngb1066]

Are these extensions requested by the defence or delaying tactics by the ccrc?

The defence has required more time in order for additional work to be carried out.  However, the reason the defence needs this extra time is that the CCRC have resisted defence requests for access to evidence such as the photographic negatives, only giving way after several months.  It is therefore the CCRC who are responsible for the delays.



 

[grahameb]

Are these extensions requested by the defence or delaying tactics by the ccrc?

The defence has required more time in order for additional work to be carried out.  However, the reason the defence needs this extra time is that the CCRC have resisted defence requests for access to evidence such as the photographic negatives, only giving way after several months.  It is therefore the CCRC who are responsible for the delays.

We need a revolution in this country to oust these criminals in the British "justice" system. I suspect a great number of these legal beagles are crooks?

[ngb1066]

Are these extensions requested by the defence or delaying tactics by the ccrc?

The defence has required more time in order for additional work to be carried out.  However, the reason the defence needs this extra time is that the CCRC have resisted defence requests for access to evidence such as the photographic negatives, only giving way after several months.  It is therefore the CCRC who are responsible for the delays.

We need a revolution in this country to oust these criminals in the British "justice" system. I suspect a great number of these legal beagles are crooks?

I think they get dragged into the system and effectively become part of it.  They seem afraid of challenging the establishment and that inevitably results in them adopting a pro prosecution attitude.  It has really opened my eyes reading the documents relating to this case and another one recently.  Instead of approaching the two cases with a critical perspective they have viewed them both from a prosecution perspective.  An example in this case is the logs.  The evidence contained in them has been rejected by the CCRC on any detail where this conflicts with the evidence given at trial by the police. 

     

[clifford]

I know this is not the correct thread, but I couldn't find it.
It is a breathe of fresh air that JB has finally mentioned AP.
I have been saying since March that AP is pivotal in this case, and at last JB has seen my way of thinking.
Folks, read his statements they are full of holes.
I am no Shelock Holmes, but to me he was disingenuous.
The family were scared that JB would cut them loose, and he was probably going to do so.

What was the cause of APs breakdown.
I am going away now to study DC Jones, and I bet I will find some sort of corruption.
Happy days smiters. Truth is I couldn't give a F***.
Kind regards, Cliff.