Author Topic: An acid test for forum members  (Read 60262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #270 on: September 02, 2011, 10:49:PM »
+ 1 Mertol +1 Chocho + Andy

andrea

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #271 on: September 02, 2011, 10:52:PM »
ta jack x

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #272 on: September 02, 2011, 10:53:PM »
For Jackie,

What does Jeremy say about this call to Mugford then?

Did it happen?

What was the content?

Why 3am?

Why did the defence miss the 'trick of light' / 'figure in a window' opportunity? ' A must read ' 143-145 Sparks  Also 160-161
« Last Edit: September 02, 2011, 11:01:PM by jon »

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #273 on: September 02, 2011, 10:54:PM »
It's funny how the police believed Mugford however many times she changed times she changed her story

Offline HMEssex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #274 on: September 02, 2011, 10:55:PM »
Well here goes, im unable to give my version on how i think the events took place on the night, but i do counter offer this to think over, Why were the twins spared full frontal facial fatal injuries? i think i might have a credible answer but wanted to see what the replies are.




As so was Sheila.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #275 on: September 02, 2011, 10:57:PM »
yes she was changing her mind as quick as a set of disco lights with the police buying her every ever changing version of events.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #276 on: September 02, 2011, 11:00:PM »
Sheila correct but its the twins , there is something here, i thought about it driving home early in morning today.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #277 on: September 02, 2011, 11:03:PM »
the exit wounds on the twins caused facial injuries.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #278 on: September 02, 2011, 11:08:PM »
were the exit wounds large ?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #279 on: September 02, 2011, 11:09:PM »
Well here goes, im unable to give my version on how i think the events took place on the night, but i do counter offer this to think over, Why were the twins spared full frontal facial fatal injuries? i think i might have a credible answer but wanted to see what the replies are.


Sheila believed her boys were possessed by the devil, but they were still her beloved boys. If Sheila killed her family, as I believe it's likely she did, she would have done so only because she was severely mentally ill. She may have been torn, on the one hand feeling that she was obeying her demonic voices and the devil, on the other hand, believing that she was performing - as Abs suggested - 'noble exorcism', an act of love to free her family from possession. But she was still the boys' mother, how could she kill them other than as she did: as quickly as possible without looking at or damaging their little faces?
« Last Edit: September 02, 2011, 11:22:PM by chochokeira »

andrea

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #280 on: September 02, 2011, 11:10:PM »
am i right in thinking that exit wounds are generally bigger than the entry wounds?

i know that one twin had exit wounds on the bridge of his nose and cheek

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #281 on: September 02, 2011, 11:11:PM »
Jeremy will have his justice done, i would not have joined if i for a second did not believe that.

Well said, Mertol +1

andrea

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #282 on: September 02, 2011, 11:11:PM »
Well here goes, im unable to give my version on how i think the events took place on the night, but i do counter offer this to think over, Why were the twins spared full frontal facial fatal injuries? i think i might have a credible answer but wanted to see what the replies are.


Sheila believed her boys were possessed by the devil, but they were still her beloved boys. If Sheila killed her family, as I believe it's likely she did, she would have done so only because she was severely mentally ill. She may have been torn, on the one hand feeling that she was obeying her demonic voices and the devil, on the other hand, believing that she was performing a 'noble exorcism', an act of love to free her family from possession. But she was still the boys' mother, how could she kill them other than as she did: as quickly as possible without looking at or damaging their little faces?


i agree with that choc, i also believe sheila didnt want to damage her own face, she was beautiful.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #283 on: September 02, 2011, 11:13:PM »
Hello Abs,

Jeremy wasn't sleeping though was he?

He phoned Julie Mugford a short while before 'the call' came in from Neville.

I was very much on Jeremy's side on this for a long time.

The call to Mugford - assuming she was telling the truth took on a new meaning when the hitman theory was introduced to me last July. If Jeremy phoned Julie at around 3am to say something like 'all's not well at the farm' then what on earth was he talking about?

Much falls back on Mugford.





Hello Sparks.

Don't hit on Abs.

How do you know Jeremy wasn't sleeping?

How can you claim Jeremy's call to Mugford was before his call was from Nevill?

You have confused me with your recent posts, are you playing some sort of game?

My views exactly, HM Essex. +1

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: An acid test for forum members
« Reply #284 on: September 02, 2011, 11:16:PM »
sparks, jb made the call to  muggy at around 3am because of the call from his dad just previous.

Well said, Andrea +1