Some very childish postings...come on girls for **** sake grow up.
And in an attempt to get somewhere back on track...
I was out last night with someone who knew the family well, and I asked him about the telephone thing.
It was my assumption that it would have been unlikely for Jeremy to have been capable of inpersonating his father, but my friend gave me a very good account of Neville's voice, which he described thus - Soft, a mixture of educated with a blend of country speak.
My friend thought an impersonation within Jeremy's vocal range.
The Bible was playing an ever growing part in family life.
While I'm here, my friend said the consensus in the area is about 50 to 1 against Jeremy. This includes D'Arcy, Goldhanger, Tollesbury, Salcott and surrounds.
So all the more reason to get to grips with some constructive debate and stop throwing insults around - you can throw them at me, no problem with that.
There's no concensus against Jeremy among my family, Sparks, and they are related to many of the original D'Arcy, Goldhanger, Tothams, Tollesbury, Tolleshunts, Messing, Tiptree, Wig Wigs, Layers and Inworth families.
All but two of my Blackwater relations have always believed that Jeremy is innocent. The other two aren't interested.
As for the Bible being a growing part of family life, my family and I would dispute that too - and I'm a Christian. By the 1980s there'd been a move away from religion, especially among young people. Although it had been very strong in those parts in times gone by, it no longer had the hold it once had.
I do know too that Jeremy had no interest in religion or the Bible, despite June's attempts to force religion down her children's throats. Jeremy could no more find a relevent section of the Bible than he could fly.
