Author Topic: Ms Mugford  (Read 8099 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #60 on: August 26, 2011, 09:53:PM »
What agegroup does JM teach? If they are larger kids, they´d know about her past, easy peasy on the internet these days.
BTW, could you imagine having her as a teacher? Poor kids. Like having Mrs. Danvers as your teacher.  ???
Ve haff veys off making zem tok.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #61 on: August 26, 2011, 09:54:PM »
The children she taught might not know her history here in England, there again the older ones may have been on the web, she seems in another world in the 2nd picture.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #62 on: August 26, 2011, 09:55:PM »
The children she taught might not know her history here in England, there again the older ones may have been on the web, she seems in another world in the 2nd picture.
They must model cabbage patch dolls on her?

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #63 on: August 26, 2011, 09:57:PM »
im not sure Grahame even those dolls had some standards!

Offline bob

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1321
  • 78.6%
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #64 on: August 26, 2011, 10:00:PM »
Whenever I feel guilty about some of the comments I make on here, you guys step up to the plate and make me realise how reasonable I actually am...

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #65 on: August 26, 2011, 10:01:PM »
would she pass a polygraph test??

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #66 on: August 26, 2011, 10:01:PM »
What agegroup does JM teach? If they are larger kids, they´d know about her past, easy peasy on the internet these days.
BTW, could you imagine having her as a teacher? Poor kids. Like having Mrs. Danvers as your teacher.  ???
I think she is head or assistant head of the school?
http://ww.wsd1.org/contacts/contacts.htm

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #67 on: August 26, 2011, 10:02:PM »
You don't believe in rehabilitation then abs?

I don't know. I believe in character though.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #68 on: August 26, 2011, 10:02:PM »
Whenever I feel guilty about some of the comments I make on here, you guys step up to the plate and make me realise how reasonable I actually am...
We've had very good teachers. ;)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #69 on: August 26, 2011, 10:04:PM »
Whenever I feel guilty about some of the comments I make on here, you guys step up to the plate and make me realise how reasonable I actually am...

 ;)

Good for you! I am feeling very unreasonable tonight!   8)

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #70 on: August 26, 2011, 10:06:PM »
the fact is Bob there is good reason to take a look at her and question , there is no positive proof that Jeremy said anything to the words of tonights the night or anything else, a month or so was it before she went to the police with her story, plenty of time to get her story right.

Offline HMEssex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #71 on: August 26, 2011, 10:07:PM »
I wonder if she still believes with communicating with the dead?

How would she now explain first blaming Sheila, then a hitman and finally Jeremy?

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #72 on: August 26, 2011, 10:09:PM »
her last choice would work

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #73 on: September 06, 2011, 09:07:AM »
Something else.

I asked him about the man and woman thing in the kitchen.

His reply was quite interesting.

He said something like - 'at first glance I don't think they could tell if it was a man or a woman' and he went on to say, that 'whoever it was there was only one of them'.

Over the months I have now spoken to Chris Bews, several members of Essex Police, a friend of Julie Mugford, two people who worked on the farm and at least 4 people who knew Jeremy Bamber.

Addionally, I have also been in contact with Eric Allison, Scott Lomax, newspaper reporters who worked on the case, Andrew Hunter and a number of others who support Jeremy.

So, I've done a fair bit, but nowhere near as much as Mike in particular.

I'm glad I've listened to both sides.


I doubt many of Sparkfilms claims...but supposing a police officer did know a little and what Sparkfilms says the police officer said was true.

'at first glance I don't think they could tell if it was a man or a woman
the key word being "they" so if indeed some officers looked through a window it was not Collins on his own but Delgado as well. That ties up with other statements which have both looking though the window though the sighting claim was only attributed to Collins.
Its far harder to pass off a wrong sighting by 2 officers as easily as a wrong sighting by one officer.


There is an issue with many things sparkfilms claims and his "stories" have holes in them and his angle on some things gives other things away that suggest his claims are unreliable and lack credibility.
Thus info sourced just from Sparkfilms in my view cannot be trusted.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2011, 09:20:AM by smiffy »

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Ms Mugford
« Reply #74 on: September 06, 2011, 09:31:AM »
Yes but "they" also had a second glance. When they entered the property they reported "twice" one dead male one dead female.
I think sparks is too easily persuade by people on the ani side. These people are not neutral, but all have a vested interest in the case in one way or another.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2011, 09:33:AM by grahame »