0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: mertol22 on August 14, 2011, 11:25:PMJeremy s trial was over before it started , he never stood a chance , quite bluntly i find it insane the police bought her story, there is not one single shred of proof Jeremy said anything about killing his family, nothing but 2nd hand hearsay, mugford will not get away with this its far from over, why flee to Canada ? whats all that about?.i think her husband is canadian.
Jeremy s trial was over before it started , he never stood a chance , quite bluntly i find it insane the police bought her story, there is not one single shred of proof Jeremy said anything about killing his family, nothing but 2nd hand hearsay, mugford will not get away with this its far from over, why flee to Canada ? whats all that about?.
I showed my friend this photo last night (she doesn't really know much about this case), and first thing she said was "what's that on her head?"!
Quote from: andrea on August 14, 2011, 11:26:PMQuote from: mertol22 on August 14, 2011, 11:25:PMJeremy s trial was over before it started , he never stood a chance , quite bluntly i find it insane the police bought her story, there is not one single shred of proof Jeremy said anything about killing his family, nothing but 2nd hand hearsay, mugford will not get away with this its far from over, why flee to Canada ? whats all that about?.i think her husband is canadian.I think her husband is a very brave man
Quote from: mertol22 on August 14, 2011, 11:25:PMJeremy s trial was over before it started , he never stood a chance , quite bluntly i find it insane the police bought her story, there is not one single shred of proof Jeremy said anything about killing his family, nothing but 2nd hand hearsay, mugford will not get away with this its far from over, why flee to Canada ? whats all that about?.She came back to London and was at the court for the appeal and the defence failed to call her - in what sense is that getting away with it by fleeing to Canada? It's hardly her fault if JB's defence couldn't find anything to challenge her with is it?
Are there no ex boyfriends who have came forward ?
Quote from: bob on August 15, 2011, 09:04:AMQuote from: mertol22 on August 14, 2011, 11:25:PMJeremy s trial was over before it started , he never stood a chance , quite bluntly i find it insane the police bought her story, there is not one single shred of proof Jeremy said anything about killing his family, nothing but 2nd hand hearsay, mugford will not get away with this its far from over, why flee to Canada ? whats all that about?.She came back to London and was at the court for the appeal and the defence failed to call her - in what sense is that getting away with it by fleeing to Canada? It's hardly her fault if JB's defence couldn't find anything to challenge her with is it?The defence were not allowed to call her to give evidence in the end.The prosecution got it blocked and the judge agreed.I think the defence were going to question her over her newspaper deal?And what saddo keeps smiting me?
Dont worry Oncesaid.Ive found out who it is!Have a +1 to make up for it.I enjoy reading your posts!