Reason, known to ngb1066, why Wakefield HMP has banned Jeremy from the press

[BarefootDanC]

I imagine any info being withheld is for confidential reasons, Steve!
Maybe anyone connected to JB is advised by his legal team what to disclose[or not] for his best interests?
Loose lips sink ships, and all that!

Confidential reasons. I wonder what they might be.

[snow66!]

I think we should get back to the main issue of the thread: why information is being withheld from members of this site.

But this isn't a private site, Steve! Anything posted here is public.

[snow66!]

Confidential reasons. I wonder what they might be.

I don't know, Dan, but i'm sure JBs legal team will disclose everything they possibly can, no doubt they are aware of the importance of public support.

[Jonathan]

I don't know, Dan, but i'm sure JBs legal team will disclose everything they possibly can, no doubt they are aware of the importance of public support.

They will only disclose what they feel is favourable to Bamber

[BarefootDanC]

I don't know, Dan, but i'm sure JBs legal team will disclose everything they possibly can, no doubt they are aware of the importance of public support.

I think quite the opposite. JB and his team will nowadays only release snippets and only to make a point which suits there narrative.

For example, apparently Julie Migford's cross examination was on this site, but got taken down. Why? Certain members have and have told me they would be willing to share it with me, except they would get back-lash from the Campaign Team.

Why?

[Steve_uk]

I think quite the opposite. JB and his team will nowadays only release snippets and only to make a point which suits there narrative.

For example, apparently Julie Migford's cross examination was on this site, but got taken down. Why? Certain members have and have told me they would be willing to share it with me, except they would get back-lash from the Campaign Team.

Why?

Tut tut. For those who are desperate it's in Roger Wilkes' book Blood Relations Chapter 29.

[Cambridgecutie]

Tut tut. For those who are desperate it's in Roger Wilkes' book Blood Relations Chapter 29.

Not the entire testimony.

I managed to read it at the time and as far as I could see there was nothing in it that was either helpful or particularly harmful other than what we already know.  So why it was withdrawn I have no idea.  It smacks of hypocrisy when JB is constantly claiming info is being withheld from the defence and yet he too appears to be withholding info. 

[snow66!]

I think quite the opposite. JB and his team will nowadays only release snippets and only to make a point which suits there narrative.

For example, apparently Julie Migford's cross examination was on this site, but got taken down. Why? Certain members have and have told me they would be willing to share it with me, except they would get back-lash from the Campaign Team.

Why?

I didn't even know her cross examination had been on the site, Dan! Must have been before my time, I am a relative newbie!

[Steve_uk]

I didn't even know her cross examination had been on the site, Dan! Must have been before my time, I am a relative newbie!

Lawyers have had 40 years to pore over every iota of testimony and drawn a blank. It's throwing mud at everyone and everything and hoping something will stick.

[David1819]

For example, apparently Julie Migford's cross examination was on this site, but got taken down. Why? Certain members have and have told me they would be willing to share it with me, except they would get back-lash from the Campaign Team.

Why?

Because Bill Robertson wanted it taken down for some reason.

[snow66!]

Lawyers have had 40 years to pore over every iota of testimony and drawn a blank. It's throwing mud at everyone and everything and hoping something will stick.

Maybe so, Steve! But then lo and behold the Aga evidence made an entry and saved the day!
No more ifs or buts, solid irrefutable evidence

[Adam]

Jeremy's cross examination was briefly on this site. 

The interesting things I read was Jeremy said he brought the bike over for Julie to go to a gym & the rabbits were around 100 yards away.

The PSOR would be interesting but will do COA esq damage to him if online.

[BarefootDanC]

Because Bill Robertson wanted it taken down for some reason.

This proves my point exactly!

Ironically, Bill Robertson has himself quite justified the Campaign Team for being secretive.

[David1819]

This proves my point exactly!

Ironically, Bill Robertson has himself quite justified the Campaign Team for being secretive.

Feel free to ask him why he wanted it taken down. I still have a copy that I downloaded while it was up.

[ILB]

I posted both Jeremy and Julie's trial transcripts they were taken down.