US-Israel Attacks Iran

[David1819]

Insane.

?

[gringo]

Worked to death was not meant to be taken literally; it was a turn of phrase. But your attitude on Huawei is naive. https://youtu.be/7gCSUK8fn8Q

https://youtu.be/uIRilldc0Bg

    My attitude on Huawei is based on knowledge and asking the right questions. Meanwhile your go to guru is (checks notes) Iain Duncan Smith. Secondly how was the phrase "worked to death" meant to be understood? The underlying point must have been that they work longer and die younger, which is the opposite of the truth. You only demonstrate your lazy and gullible thought process further with your replies.

[David1819]

    All of it is correct hence your non rebuttal.

Why waste my time on a rebuttal? You are the Tankie version of Steve. And Steve is the Christian version of you.

[gringo]

Why waste my time on a rebuttal? You are the Tankie version of Steve. And Steve is the Christian version of you.

   "Wasting your time on a rebuttal", as you put it, would help to bolster your point. After telling Roch that he ought to "study and understand a conflict before forming an opinion on it.", I would have thought you would be keen to demonstrate your own "studying and understanding" by articulating a proper response.   

[David1819]

   "Wasting your time on a rebuttal", as you put it, would help to bolster your point. After telling Roch that he ought to "study and understand a conflict before forming an opinion on it.", I would have thought you would be keen to demonstrate your own "studying and understanding" by articulating a proper response.

Roch asked a question and I simply answered it. You are just spouting fantasy as fact and cannot be taken seriously.

[Roch]

More LEGO from Iran 🇮🇷.  But why does Trump have a bandaged hand?

https://youtu.be/2ZmIOg3BibU?si=H_4srKpnSeret_sy

[David1819]

B-52 Stratofortress are now flying over Iran as Trumps "deal deadline" nears.

[ngb1066]

B-52 Stratofortress are now flying over Iran as Trumps "deal deadline" nears.

This is going to end really well David!

[gringo]

This is going to end really well David!

    It's likely horseshit anyway, ngb. The whole thing is based on this quote by General Dan Caine, "In the past 30 days, we’ve hit over 11,000 targets. With growing air superiority, we’ve also launched the first B-52 overland missions." Rather than excitedly bragging about supposed air superiority/supremacy as David is wont to do, first of all Gen. Caine's statement needs parsing to discover what he has actually stated. First of all, exactly where over Iran are US B52's supposedly flying? Are they flying over Tehran?. Or is it just inside part of Iran's border? Previously the US were flying missions just inside Iran's borders before launching expensive and limited stand off munitions. If the B52's are launching stand off munitions rather than abundant and cheap dumb gravity bombs then nothing has changed apart from the delivery means. F35's to B52's.
     This in itself raises the further question as to why that would be. Do the US need to use long distance bombers because of the smouldering ruins of their ME airbases and refuelling planes? Are they dressing up the utter failure of the mission by spinning some story about B52's flying over Iran into a success story? Dimwits such as David makes the inference intended but not actually stated by Gen Caine.
     The vagueness of the claim by Gen Caine leads me to suspect this.
   

[gringo]

This is going to end really well David!

   In fact Caine's statement doesn't even mention Iranian airspace, only that the "First overland B52 missions" have been launched. Over whose land? Iraq, Saudi Arabia? Doesn't say. He doesn't say much at all really, it all relies on the listener's own inference.

[Steve_uk]

Why was Iran enriching uranium to a level not required for medical research? https://youtu.be/gU-Lz3EiCAg

[gringo]

Why was Iran enriching uranium to a level not required for medical research? https://youtu.be/gU-Lz3EiCAg

    The 60% enrichment came after the US pulled out of the JCPOA and applied sanctions illegally and unilaterally. Using common sense, if you have any, it is unlikely that Iran would announce publicly that they are going to enrich uranium to those levels and then do so in order to build a "secret" nuclear weapon. They would surely have done so "secretly" if that was their intent. You are an easily led and gullible fool.
     Do you honestly believe that Iran wouldn't already have nukes if that were their intent? None of this is about Iran having nuclear weapons and only the hopelessly naive believe this. It's about stealing and controlling oil, mineral wealth and controlling trade routes. Are you really as stupid as you put across?

[David1819]

    It's likely horseshit anyway, ngb. The whole thing is based on this quote by General Dan Caine, "In the past 30 days, we’ve hit over 11,000 targets. With growing air superiority, we’ve also launched the first B-52 overland missions." Rather than excitedly bragging about supposed air superiority/supremacy as David is wont to do, first of all Gen. Caine's statement needs parsing to discover what he has actually stated. First of all, exactly where over Iran are US B52's supposedly flying? Are they flying over Tehran?. Or is it just inside part of Iran's border? Previously the US were flying missions just inside Iran's borders before launching expensive and limited stand off munitions. If the B52's are launching stand off munitions rather than abundant and cheap dumb gravity bombs then nothing has changed apart from the delivery means. F35's to B52's.
     This in itself raises the further question as to why that would be. Do the US need to use long distance bombers because of the smouldering ruins of their ME airbases and refuelling planes? Are they dressing up the utter failure of the mission by spinning some story about B52's flying over Iran into a success story? Dimwits such as David makes the inference intended but not actually stated by Gen Caine.
     The vagueness of the claim by Gen Caine leads me to suspect this.
   

Ramblings of a madman.

[snow66!]

    The 60% enrichment came after the US pulled out of the JCPOA and applied sanctions illegally and unilaterally. Using common sense, if you have any, it is unlikely that Iran would announce publicly that they are going to enrich uranium to those levels and then do so in order to build a "secret" nuclear weapon. They would surely have done so "secretly" if that was their intent. You are an easily led and gullible fool.
     Do you honestly believe that Iran wouldn't already have nukes if that were their intent? None of this is about Iran having nuclear weapons and only the hopelessly naive believe this. It's about stealing and controlling oil, mineral wealth and controlling trade routes. Are you really as stupid as you put across?

I have to admit that I am just as naive as Steve, gringo!
I believed everything Marco Rubio was saying about the dangers of nuclear weapons in the hands of a lunatic regime.

[gringo]

I have to admit that I am just as naive as Steve, gringo!
I believed everything Marco Rubio was saying about the dangers of nuclear weapons in the hands of a lunatic regime.

  Yes you are naive and susceptible to propaganda.