Author Topic: New Yorker podcast  (Read 765 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6481
New Yorker podcast
« on: October 21, 2025, 04:19:PM »
The long awaited New Yorker podcast about the Jeremy Bamber case is now scheduled for release on 28th October.  Here is a link to a press release with details and a short trailer:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/press-room/in-the-dark-releases-blood-relatives-an-examination-of-a-notorious-british-crime

It looks as if it is going to be detailed because it is in six parts.  It will be very interesting to hear this.  The trailer includes a small clip of Milbank speaking.

« Last Edit: October 21, 2025, 04:21:PM by ngb1066 »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2025, 04:34:PM »
The only interesting thing will be hearing Millbank speak. If it is Millbank & not an actor saying aledged quotes from him.

Millbank receiving a 999 call from WHF and the caller not saying anything is refuted by Burrell's WS. But was the only new claim The New Yorker made. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2025, 04:44:PM »
Six episodes sounds huge just to repeat what has already been said hundreds of times before since 1985.

But no surprise considering how long the 2024 article was.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12695
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2025, 08:10:PM »
Must admit will be interesting to hear Milibanks voice.

Fruitless though moving forward wise as the bloke is deceased.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline BarefootDanC

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 792
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2025, 10:20:PM »
Must admit will be interesting to hear Milibanks voice.

Fruitless though moving forward wise as the bloke is deceased.

That depends, because if what he said in the interview, taken in context, is clear that a 999 call was made then the Campaign Team would be right, but if taken in context he said something else then it would prove that Heidi had been taken in by the Campaign Team.

The contemporaneous evidence shows that at 6:09, "999" was just being used to listen in.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3120
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2025, 10:42:PM »
That depends, because if what he said in the interview, taken in context, is clear that a 999 call was made then the Campaign Team would be right, but if taken in context he said something else then it would prove that Heidi had been taken in by the Campaign Team.

The contemporaneous evidence shows that at 6:09, "999" was just being used to listen in.

It also shows that the line status at WHF changed from off the hook to engaged at 05.47.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12695
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2025, 11:23:AM »
That depends, because if what he said in the interview, taken in context, is clear that a 999 call was made then the Campaign Team would be right, but if taken in context he said something else then it would prove that Heidi had been taken in by the Campaign Team.

The contemporaneous evidence shows that at 6:09, "999" was just being used to listen in.

Dont know how much it would amount to, if its just an audio clip it could be anybody speaking and also as Mr Milibank is no longer with us it cant be challenged by a respondant KC at any subsequent appeal hearing.

Any layman especially the judiciary would be highly skeptical.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2025, 11:23:AM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13462
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2025, 01:13:PM »
Thanks for bringing this to our attention Neil.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2025, 05:38:PM »
Main points of episode 2 -

DB spoke. As usual.

AE & PE did not speak. As usual.

DB said Jeremy & June had a poor relationship.

Jeremy liked to go to strip clubs.

RB believed Sheila slept through the massacre and was woken by Jeremy.

DB & AE are not on good terms.

RB believed Jeremy may have worn a wet suit. As it would be easy to wash blood off.

DB repeated that Jeremy had asked Nevill to leave the cash in the caravan office safe. A few hours before he broke in.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2025, 12:35:PM »
Episode 3 was interesting. As it was interaction between Heidi & Bamber.

Hearing him cry & talking about 'mum's engagement ring' made me agree he 'should have been an actor'.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2025, 12:47:PM »
Bamber agrees he asked the police to enter WHF straight away. The podcast says the police believe this was because he wanted everything done and dusted as soon as possible. With the minimum of fuss & attention.

I always thought he would have preferred a siege situation to have arisen. But either could have worked for him.

He probably suspected the first handful of officers who arrived would not go into WHF after he gave them his narrative. So was prepared for a long wait outside.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2025, 12:50:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2025, 04:26:PM »
Bamber's reason for not dialling 999 makes no sense - 'I didn't know if it was an emergency'.

So why call Chelmsford Police?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20275
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2025, 05:09:PM »
Bamber's reason for not dialling 999 makes no sense - 'I didn't know if it was an emergency'.

So why call Chelmsford Police?
Exactly, especially as he knew Nevill would want the incident hushed up, which was the reason for Jeremy's assertion his father telephoned him in the first place.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2025, 05:13:PM »
On the night - Nevill rang me as he didn't like to involve the authorities. So I called them!

In 2010, Nevill did call the police.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12695
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2025, 05:44:AM »
Listened to episode 3

Maybe Heidi should have thrown in the AM question.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me