Author Topic: New Yorker podcast  (Read 70 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6478
New Yorker podcast
« on: Yesterday at 04:19 PM »
The long awaited New Yorker podcast about the Jeremy Bamber case is now scheduled for release on 28th October.  Here is a link to a press release with details and a short trailer:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/press-room/in-the-dark-releases-blood-relatives-an-examination-of-a-notorious-british-crime

It looks as if it is going to be detailed because it is in six parts.  It will be very interesting to hear this.  The trailer includes a small clip of Milbank speaking.

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:21 PM by ngb1066 »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43239
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 04:34 PM »
The only interesting thing will be hearing Millbank speak. If it is Millbank & not an actor saying aledged quotes from him.

Millbank receiving a 999 call from WHF and the caller not saying anything is refuted by Burrell's WS. But was the only new claim The New Yorker made. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43239
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 04:44 PM »
Six episodes sounds huge just to repeat what has already been said hundreds of times before since 1985.

But no surprise considering how long the 2024 article was.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12612
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 08:10 PM »
Must admit will be interesting to hear Milibanks voice.

Fruitless though moving forward wise as the bloke is deceased.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline BarefootDanC

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 787
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 10:20 PM »
Must admit will be interesting to hear Milibanks voice.

Fruitless though moving forward wise as the bloke is deceased.

That depends, because if what he said in the interview, taken in context, is clear that a 999 call was made then the Campaign Team would be right, but if taken in context he said something else then it would prove that Heidi had been taken in by the Campaign Team.

The contemporaneous evidence shows that at 6:09, "999" was just being used to listen in.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3116
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 10:42 PM »
That depends, because if what he said in the interview, taken in context, is clear that a 999 call was made then the Campaign Team would be right, but if taken in context he said something else then it would prove that Heidi had been taken in by the Campaign Team.

The contemporaneous evidence shows that at 6:09, "999" was just being used to listen in.

It also shows that the line status at WHF changed from off the hook to engaged at 05.47.