Heidi (the New Yorker) was asked to supply the Millbank Audio to the CCRC Snow and they refused, if they did I’m sure the CCRC would look at it again, but how much time will this have cost the CCRC and Jeremy Bamber if they did Snow?
I guess now that the CCRC asked for the tape recording in its full unedited version, and we understand this was refused, it now becomes a problem, it has now become Problematic in other words because, although it’s not unlawful to record someone without prior knowledge and it could be used as evidence in Court, Sharing the Recording Problems may arise if the recording is shared beyond the police and legal proceedings (e.g., released to the public or sold) without consent, as this could lead to claims for misuse of private information? Weight of Evidence: The court will assess the authenticity, relevance, and context of the recording. An unedited, full conversation is important; mere snippets might be viewed with caution.
Then we move onto this Statement by Essex police….. A police statement indicates that former Essex police officer PC Nicholas (Nicky) Milbank provided a new statement saying he had not been aware he was talking to a journalist and did not endorse the subsequent New Yorker article.
