DocMaker article on Milbank

[Adam]

I have been assured by the Campaign Team (Simon Kelly) that once the CCRC (and any appeal) has ran its course, they will be able to share all the "new evidence" publicly.

They say that if they do not hold certain cards close to their chest, it would somehow harm the CCRC application. Make of that what you will.

A bit late by then.

But could be used for the 2042 CCRC application.

[BarefootDanC]

I was thinking more of the documents sealed until 2054. It does make one suspicious as to why that should be.

I think this is just sealing of documents to the general public.

[ILB]

A bit late by then.

But could be used for the 2042 CCRC application.

Do you believe people will campaign for Jeremy posthumously?

[Adam]

The podcast is up.

Part 1 seems to be the family history. Dating back decades before the massacre. 

No one said it was going to be short!

[snow66!]

You will hopefully get the New Yorker article on Milbank tomorrow, Steve.
That may give you something juicy to get your teeth into!

Oh well, thats the first two episodes of Heidi Blakes New Yorker article available to listen to!
No mention of Milbank yet, next episode/s available on Tuesday, although you can listen to all six episodes right now if you have a New Yorker subscription.
Anyone here subscribed?

[Adam]

It is very warped of Bamber to put rats into June's car. As well as cycle around her while taunting her.

Bamber testified 'there was a lack of understanding' !

[Steve_uk]

Is there a link to the podcasts?

[ILB]

It is very warped of Bamber to put rats into June's car. As well as cycle around her while taunting her.

Bamber testified 'there was a lack of understanding' !

Only BW said Bamber did this.

Has Bamber ever been challenged about this?

BW bearing in mind once said she got along with Bamber better than her own son. She also went missing days prior and had to be found by DS Jones prior to giving evidence in the 86 trial.

[snow66!]

Is there a link to the podcasts?

I listened to it over on Twitter, Steve.
I'm no use at posting links to anything, but no doubt someone will post them here soon.
The likes of ngb or Dan perhaps?

[Adam]

Only BW said Bamber did this.

Has Bamber ever been challenged about this?

BW bearing in mind once said she got along with Bamber better than her own son. She also went missing days prior and had to be found by DS Jones prior to giving evidence in the 86 trial.

Only BW is enough.

Who else is going to say it?

Do you agree it was warped of Bamber?

[ILB]

Only BW is enough.

Who else is going to say it?

Do you agree it was warped of Bamber?

No proof it happened.

Anyone can say anything.

[Adam]

No proof it happened.

Anyone can say anything.

It is no surprise he did that to June. Sadly he had no love or respect for her. The judge said he was warped.

[ILB]

It is no surprise he did that to June. Sadly he had no love or respect for her. The judge said he was warped.

Neither of the children did. They preferred Nevill.

[Adam]

Neither of the children did. They preferred Nevill.

Sheila had love and respect for June. June was heavily financially supporting her, visiting her & Sheila was staying at WHF.

June may have pushed her religous beliefs too far on both of them when younger. Although Bamber claimed Sheila was religous & left a bible next to her 

Bamber had no love or respect for June. Resulting in his warped actions.

[Hardy Boy]

It is very warped of Bamber to put rats into June's car. As well as cycle around her while taunting her.

Bamber testified 'there was a lack of understanding' !

I believe he was possibly warped enough to do this,  there have been other instances brought up of his use of Rats, Aldridge refers to, and JM remarks about the Rats eating his Marijuana plants making them easy to catch, so possibly he did this to June, someone who he had a dislike of?