DocMaker article on Milbank

[Hardy Boy]

That rifle needed a silencer and sights.

The relatives were sitting in on conversations from an early stage. So may have mentioned that rifle needed sights and silencer.

The raid team may have mentioned the rifle had no sights or silencer which was unusual.

The police would have seen the rifle on Sheila. An officer with basic knowledge may know it came with sights and silencer.

When the officers did an inventory of the gun cupboard, they would have seen sights and a silencer.

Bamber may have said he rushed our to shoot the rabbits and did not have time to put the sights and silencer on.

I think because he’d come up with the Rabbit story, it triggered a question about sights and silencers.

[Hardy Boy]

Well again, how could the police start a conversation about a silencer unless they had found one, HB? Which has always been denied!

So your saying the police couldn’t start a conversation about the silencer unless they’d already found a silencer?  Are you SERIOUS?   They are  allowed to ask whatever questions they want, he wasn’t a suspect at this stage, they’re not treating him as the murderer or trying to catch him out, he’s helping an inquiry, he’s the last person to see his family, he’s the last person alive that handled the MURDER weapon, they want to know how HE left the rifle that’s all.

[snow66!]

That rifle needed a silencer and sights.

The relatives were sitting in on conversations from an early stage. So may have mentioned that rifle needed sights and silencer.

The raid team may have mentioned the rifle had no sights or silencer which was unusual.

The police would have seen the rifle on Sheila. An officer with basic knowledge may know it came with sights and silencer.

When the officers did an inventory of the gun cupboard, they would have seen sights and a silencer.

Bamber may have said he rushed our to shoot the rabbits and did not have time to put the sights and silencer on.

Thank you, Adam.
BUT!! Pure unfounded speculation!

[snow66!]

I think because he’d come up with the Rabbit story, it triggered a question about sights and silencers.

Again, pure speculation, HB!

[snow66!]

So your saying the police couldn’t start a conversation about the silencer unless they’d already found a silencer?  Are you SERIOUS?   They are  allowed to ask whatever questions they want, he wasn’t a suspect at this stage, they’re not treating him as the murderer or trying to catch him out, he’s helping an inquiry, he’s the last person to see his family, he’s the last person alive that handled the MURDER weapon, they want to know how HE left the rifle that’s all.

They simply wanted to know if he left it loaded and ready to shoot, HB, thats all!

[Hardy Boy]

They simply wanted to know if he left it loaded and ready to shoot, HB, thats all!

No they didn’t, they wanted to know where he left it, did anyone see him load the magazine, did he actually shoot at the rabbits, how many bullets did he load, how many were left in the Magazine and questions were brought up about the silencer and sights.

[Hardy Boy]

Again, pure speculation, HB!

Ha Ha something your not very good at.

[Hardy Boy]

Thank you, Adam.
BUT!! Pure unfounded speculation!

Don't try to be the Pontificator your not Snow, at least try.

[snow66!]

Don't try to be the Pontificator your not Snow, at least try.

But there can be no denying that the available evidence points to JB voluntarily telling the police about the silencers existence, HB, suggesting he had no fears about it being seized as an exhibit, hence it has to follow that JB did not try to hide the silencer in the gun cupboard!

[Jane]

But there can be no denying that the available evidence points to JB voluntarily telling the police about the silencers existence, HB, suggesting he had no fears about it being seized as an exhibit, hence it has to follow that JB did not try to hide the silencer in the gun cupboard!

I'm not sure how you arrive at JB having "no fears". The situation was as it was. It was of his making. Adhering to his own claim that it was always best to tell as much of the truth as possible, he just had to run with it and hope he'd done enough to cover himself. I can't help but think there may have been times when a change of underwear may have been necessary?

[Hardy Boy]

But there can be no denying that the available evidence points to JB voluntarily telling the police about the silencers existence, HB, suggesting he had no fears about it being seized as an exhibit, hence it has to follow that JB did not try to hide the silencer in the gun cupboard!

Sorry I misunderstood you, yes he did give voluntarily evidence about the silencers existence once he’d been questioned and placed to give an unavoidable answer,  but if your saying he gave evidence before being questioned, please post this evidence.  You say you’ve seen the evidence, I think in a book please share it and put us out of our misery Snow.

[ngb1066]

I am not sure is this link has been posted yet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0DNU1aTGVQ
It is a lengthy Sonia programme on Youtube dealing with the Jeremy Bamber case.  It includes a discussion with Philip Walker about the New Yorker podcasts.

 

[ngb1066]

Gazette interview with Heidi Blake:

[ngb1066]

Daily Mail article.

[snow66!]

Gazette interview with Heidi Blake:

What do you think happened at 6.09, ngb?
Or are you just waiting to see if any more documentation surfaces first?