Author Topic: Article about recent decision  (Read 17685 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #375 on: July 14, 2025, 08:39:AM »
Yes, Jack Hargreaves was a 'one of a kind' Roch! very interesting fellow, no doubt you will also remember him from 'How' as well.
Sadly,the wheeltappers has not stood the test of time though! Roger whittaker was fine, but one act had a guy firing darts at a board using his mouth, so bad that it was good as they say! Like many of the acts, very dated and of its time, sadly.

I've avoided the wheel tappers. Looked terrible. Hargreaves showed us a lost way of life. I remember HOW. Can you remember The Good Old Days with Roy Hudd?

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13162
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #376 on: July 14, 2025, 08:51:AM »
Have you ever dialogued with Chris Roberts?

I have, on one of the facebook groups sometime ago.

It was only a minor disagreement on something from what I recall. But then he proceeded to go on a facebook business page of mine and leave strange and abusive comments.

A proper weirdo. Very bizarre.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5958
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #377 on: July 14, 2025, 11:16:AM »
I've avoided the wheel tappers. Looked terrible. Hargreaves showed us a lost way of life. I remember HOW. Can you remember The Good Old Days with Roy Hudd?
Yes we had to watch The Good Old Days regularly with our parents Roch.
I was just thinking, Fred Dinenage was a co-host with Jack Hargreaves on How, and he has gone on to do many true crime programmes!

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #378 on: July 14, 2025, 11:25:AM »
Yes we had to watch The Good Old Days regularly with our parents Roch.
I was just thinking, Fred Dinenage was a co-host with Jack Hargreaves on How, and he has gone on to do many true crime programmes!

Who was the bloke with the one man band? Used to ride bicycles. Bit of an eccentric. May have been a northerner?

Was it Mike Harding?
« Last Edit: July 14, 2025, 11:32:AM by Roch »

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5958
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #379 on: July 14, 2025, 11:35:AM »
Who was the bloke with the one man band? Used to ride bicycles. Bit of an eccentric. May have been a northerner?

Was it Mike Harding?
Mmm, not sure, Roch, there used to be a few one man band acts! I'll get back to you on that.

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5958
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #380 on: July 14, 2025, 11:41:AM »
Who was the bloke with the one man band? Used to ride bicycles. Bit of an eccentric. May have been a northerner?

Was it Mike Harding?
Ah yes, just looked him up, yes Mike Harding was actually on the Wheeltappers a few weeks ago, but he didn't do a one man band act, maybe had a banjo though, cant remember!

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #381 on: July 14, 2025, 11:55:AM »
Ah yes, just looked him up, yes Mike Harding was actually on the Wheeltappers a few weeks ago, but he didn't do a one man band act, maybe had a banjo though, cant remember!

Apparently he's from Crumpsall. You can't get more of a northern name than that!

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5958
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #382 on: July 14, 2025, 12:36:PM »
Apparently he's from Crumpsall. You can't get more of a northern name than that!
Ah yes, a suburb of Manchester! dont think i've heard of it before, Roch.
But yes, I remember Mike Harding quite well come to think of it, he was popular in the 80's with his TV shows. Similar kind of act to Max Boyce, song and story telling kind of act.
Still going strong I see!
« Last Edit: July 14, 2025, 12:38:PM by snow66! »

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3358
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #383 on: July 14, 2025, 04:24:PM »
Can anyone explain why he needed to keep climbing through the windows to get inside WHF,  why would he keep trying different windows in the last six months prior to his families death?

I find this post deliberately misleading and do not like the use of unsubstantiated claims. My guess is he  used an interview with JB and put his own spin on what was actually said.

There’s no public record of Jeremy Bamber admitting to entering or attempting to enter White House Farm via various windows over a six-month period. However, the windows at the farmhouse have been a point of contention in the case. The prosecution alleged that Bamber used them as entry and exit points during the murders, while his supporters argue that the evidence surrounding the windows was misrepresented or mishandled.

A podcast episode titled The Windows at White House Farm discusses these alleged entry points in detail, including claims about police conduct and forensic inconsistencies. But as far as direct admissions go—none appear to exist.

Below are two responses from the CT. Which give documented versions of what they claim actually happened. HB's post is a totally biased view which supports his stance that JB is guilty. Where he gets his facts from I do not know. It seems to be a method of blackening JB. If you have an interest in this aspect of the case I would suggest you watch these video's and come to your own conclusions on this matter.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=the+windows+at+whitehouse+farm&mid=47B7580C72A1BAB5272D47B7580C72A1BAB5272D&FORM=VIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2DZbvttUIE

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6599
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #384 on: July 14, 2025, 05:44:PM »
I find this post deliberately misleading and do not like the use of unsubstantiated claims. My guess is he  used an interview with JB and put his own spin on what was actually said.

There’s no public record of Jeremy Bamber admitting to entering or attempting to enter White House Farm via various windows over a six-month period. However, the windows at the farmhouse have been a point of contention in the case. The prosecution alleged that Bamber used them as entry and exit points during the murders, while his supporters argue that the evidence surrounding the windows was misrepresented or mishandled.

A podcast episode titled The Windows at White House Farm discusses these alleged entry points in detail, including claims about police conduct and forensic inconsistencies. But as far as direct admissions go—none appear to exist.

Below are two responses from the CT. Which give documented versions of what they claim actually happened. HB's post is a totally biased view which supports his stance that JB is guilty. Where he gets his facts from I do not know. It seems to be a method of blackening JB. If you have an interest in this aspect of the case I would suggest you watch these video's and come to your own conclusions on this matter.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=the+windows+at+whitehouse+farm&mid=47B7580C72A1BAB5272D47B7580C72A1BAB5272D&FORM=VIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2DZbvttUIE

Bit rich coming from you.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #385 on: July 14, 2025, 06:13:PM »
I find this post deliberately misleading and do not like the use of unsubstantiated claims. My guess is he  used an interview with JB and put his own spin on what was actually said.

There’s no public record of Jeremy Bamber admitting to entering or attempting to enter White House Farm via various windows over a six-month period. However, the windows at the farmhouse have been a point of contention in the case. The prosecution alleged that Bamber used them as entry and exit points during the murders, while his supporters argue that the evidence surrounding the windows was misrepresented or mishandled.

A podcast episode titled The Windows at White House Farm discusses these alleged entry points in detail, including claims about police conduct and forensic inconsistencies. But as far as direct admissions go—none appear to exist.

Below are two responses from the CT. Which give documented versions of what they claim actually happened. HB's post is a totally biased view which supports his stance that JB is guilty. Where he gets his facts from I do not know. It seems to be a method of blackening JB. If you have an interest in this aspect of the case I would suggest you watch these video's and come to your own conclusions on this matter.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=the+windows+at+whitehouse+farm&mid=47B7580C72A1BAB5272D47B7580C72A1BAB5272D&FORM=VIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2DZbvttUIE
  you know or have you by any means whatsoever got into whitehouse Farm by a window since the house was painted last? JB
R. I couldn't say. JB
Q. Mr BAMBER she its a straight forward simple question, have you since the house was decorated last got into White house Farm either by forcing a window or opening an unlatched window? JB
R.
I have got in through windows at different times through my life. I cannot remember whether I have done it since it was last decorated. JB
Q. If you can't remember you could have done? JB
R. Or could not have done. JB.
Q. What window have you been in by? JB
R. Kitchen windows, scullery windows downstairs toilet windows and sitting
room window. In the last six months I can't say how many times Ive done it. JB
Have you ever got in a window by putting something in between the window frames like a knife to move the catch so you could slide a window open? JB
Yes. JB
Q. Which window in the White house have you done that to? JB
R. Downstairs toilet, the lounge window. JB
-109pm Break for tea. JB
2118pm Resumed intervier. JB.
Q.
I will show you a photograph very similar to the last one and ask you this.
(Photograph show to accused and solicitor). Have you ever got in that window recently by using a knife to open the latch? JB
R.
I can't be sure of the last binee time I did. JB.
Q. What room do you call that? JB R.
Downstairs toilet. JB
But you have been
into that room by using a knife moving the catch and
then getting in at sometime or other? JB
R. Yes. JB

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #386 on: July 14, 2025, 06:33:PM »
I find this post deliberately misleading and do not like the use of unsubstantiated claims. My guess is he  used an interview with JB and put his own spin on what was actually said.

There’s no public record of Jeremy Bamber admitting to entering or attempting to enter White House Farm via various windows over a six-month period. However, the windows at the farmhouse have been a point of contention in the case. The prosecution alleged that Bamber used them as entry and exit points during the murders, while his supporters argue that the evidence surrounding the windows was misrepresented or mishandled.

A podcast episode titled The Windows at White House Farm discusses these alleged entry points in detail, including claims about police conduct and forensic inconsistencies. But as far as direct admissions go—none appear to exist.

Below are two responses from the CT. Which give documented versions of what they claim actually happened. HB's post is a totally biased view which supports his stance that JB is guilty. Where he gets his facts from I do not know. It seems to be a method of blackening JB. If you have an interest in this aspect of the case I would suggest you watch these video's and come to your own conclusions on this matter.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=the+windows+at+whitehouse+farm&mid=47B7580C72A1BAB5272D47B7580C72A1BAB5272D&FORM=VIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2DZbvttUIE
Its not HB’s Claim, it’s Bamber Claim.  He even claimed he got in through a window at WHF the weekend he was released on bail.

I don’t do it to support any stance,  I wish I could find something that points to his innocence, but when something is put out there I check things out and cross check like I did with the 999 call none sense, in a way I hoped it might be true, but it isn’t.  But we have had it for so long on this forum, through posters like YOU putting idiotic nonsense as truth, I don’t and will not buy your shit.

What I don’t do,  I don’t make things up unlike  you do, you do more damage for Bamber, and everyone can see your a crack pot conspiracy theorist and totally useless and damage your credibility as a poster.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2025, 06:35:PM by Hardy Boy »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #387 on: July 14, 2025, 06:40:PM »
I find this post deliberately misleading and do not like the use of unsubstantiated claims. My guess is he  used an interview with JB and put his own spin on what was actually said.

There’s no public record of Jeremy Bamber admitting to entering or attempting to enter White House Farm via various windows over a six-month period. However, the windows at the farmhouse have been a point of contention in the case. The prosecution alleged that Bamber used them as entry and exit points during the murders, while his supporters argue that the evidence surrounding the windows was misrepresented or mishandled.

A podcast episode titled The Windows at White House Farm discusses these alleged entry points in detail, including claims about police conduct and forensic inconsistencies. But as far as direct admissions go—none appear to exist.

Below are two responses from the CT. Which give documented versions of what they claim actually happened. HB's post is a totally biased view which supports his stance that JB is guilty. Where he gets his facts from I do not know. It seems to be a method of blackening JB. If you have an interest in this aspect of the case I would suggest you watch these video's and come to your own conclusions on this matter.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=the+windows+at+whitehouse+farm&mid=47B7580C72A1BAB5272D47B7580C72A1BAB5272D&FORM=VIRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2DZbvttUIE
2002 Appeal judgement points 283-285: https://ceadstorage.blob.core.windows.net/cead-images/Bamber.PDF

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #388 on: July 14, 2025, 06:44:PM »

So, having been out cold for three hours, he slowly recovers, and having had a stroke or heart attack and a fractured skull, gets up and phones JB! By the way, the White House is the presidential residence in America. White House Farm is a  family home in Tolleshunt D'Arcy.
That's a bit mean, Jane. Ann Eaton often refers to the White House in statements. It must be shorthand for the farm.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Article about recent decision
« Reply #389 on: July 14, 2025, 07:12:PM »
That's a bit mean, Jane. Ann Eaton often refers to the White House in statements. It must be shorthand for the farm.




I'm sorry you think that, Steve. I feel it's disrespectful to give it other than its correct name. Ann, as family, can call it what she likes. My partner lived in another White House Farm, only a few miles from Tolleshunt D'Arcy. Neither he, nore his family ever refer to it as other than White House Farm