For NGB:

[Adam]

Please respond to my suggestion yesterday.

This was that I PM you when ILB is abusive towards me. Unprovoked. You can then implement a ban.

This stops me reacting & back & forth abuse happening. Which degrades the forum.

I have reacted twice to him in the last two days when (unprovoked) ILB called me a 'tit' and said I was 'trolling'. 

I do not need to resort to unprovoked abuse myself as feel confident in my guilty stance.

Unfortunately I will react to abuse from supporters not confident in there stance trying to deflect. As ignoring will not stop them.

I did make a similar suggestion to you via PM when BuboBubo was calling me a 'Hippo'. You did not respond.

Now Mike is no longer here I assume you are in complete control of the forum. Please ensure it runs smoothly.

Thank you.

[ngb1066]

Please respond to my suggestion yesterday.

This was that I PM you when ILB is abusive towards me. Unprovoked. You can then implement a ban.

This stops me reacting & back & forth abuse happening. Which degrades the forum.

I have reacted twice to him in the last two days when (unprovoked) ILB called me a 'tit' and said I was 'trolling'. 

I do not need to resort to unprovoked abuse myself as feel confident in my guilty stance.

Unfortunately I will react to abuse from supporters not confident in there stance trying to deflect. As ignoring will not stop them.

I did make a similar suggestion to you via PM when BuboBubo was calling me a 'Hippo'. You did not respond.

Now Mike is no longer here I assume you are in complete control of the forum. Please ensure it runs smoothly.

Thank you.

I have it clear many times before what the policy of the forum moderation team is.  It has not changed.
We intervene only when necessary.  When we do intervene we act in an even handed way. 

[Adam]

Thank you NGB.

I don't need to use abuse as a weapon as feel confident in my stance.

So frustrating when I get sucked into responding like for like. When people less confident in there stance use abuse as a tactic.

So was hopeing for a tightening up as it seems to be getting worse. But not to worry.

[ILB]

Pot calling kettle black.

[ILB]

Just for the record I don't have a stance on the case. I am on the fence and I always will be.

[ngb1066]

Pot calling kettle black.

I agree ILB.

[Adam]

Pot calling kettle black.

That agrees with me.

'Just responding to you calling me.... '

I don't need to resort to abuse as confident in my stance and theories. But sadly react to your abuse.

You are not even confident enough to admit your a supporter! Resorting to abuse when struggling. Which is becoming more frequent.

[ILB]

That agrees with me.

'Just responding to you calling me.... '

I don't need to resort to abuse as confident in my stance and theories. But sadly react to your abuse.

You are not even confident enough to admit your a supporter! Resorting to abuse when struggling. Which is becoming more frequent.

Struggling against you?

Laughable.

I'm not a supporter. I have an interest in the case. Hence I come on this forum.

[Adam]

Struggling against you?

Laughable.

I'm not a supporter. I have an interest in the case. Hence I come on this forum.

So why do you resort to abuse?

[ILB]

So why do you resort to abuse?

I don't resort to abuse I respond in kind to the abuse I get given. You yourself on numerous occasions have dished out abuse. Not just to me. You often patronise people ( or attempt to) who share a polar opposite view which you do on the case. Telling posters to " move on " you have been rude to lookout in the past saying she supports Bamber because he sends her Christmas cards you have been rude to Rob etc other Bamber supporters.

You believe Bambers gulity, fair enough. There are people who don't. You demand sources from people with time limits yet when I ask for sources you don't deliver.

In regards to this thread in my estimation it's clear as crystal you did it to try and goad. I'm not for one moment buying you are aggrieved. You are just trying to cause hassle. Even the tone addressed to NGB is just dripping in sarcasm. You were looking for a reaction from me and you will get it from me because I am quick to bite.

If you don't like the fact that I'm on the fence and you don't like the fact I disagree with most of your posts or offer an alternative view Simply put me on ignore and move on. There is no need to mess people about with thread topics like this although I'm sure this is how you get your kicks.

[Adam]

I don't resort to abuse I respond in kind to the abuse I get given. You yourself on numerous occasions have dished out abuse. Not just to me. You often patronise people ( or attempt to) who share a polar opposite view which you do on the case. Telling posters to " move on " you have been rude to lookout in the past saying she supports Bamber because he sends her Christmas cards you have been rude to Rob etc other Bamber supporters.

You believe Bambers gulity, fair enough. There are people who don't. You demand sources from people with time limits yet when I ask for sources you don't deliver.

In regards to this thread in my estimation it's clear as crystal you did it to try and goad. I'm not for one moment buying you are aggrieved. You are just trying to cause hassle. Even the tone addressed to NGB is just dripping in sarcasm. You were looking for a reaction from me and you will get it from me because I am quick to bite.

If you don't like the fact that I'm on the fence and you don't like the fact I disagree with most of your posts or offer an alternative view Simply put me on ignore and move on. There is no need to mess people about with thread topics like this although I'm sure this is how you get your kicks.

As said in my thread post, I am confident in my stance and therories. So don't need to resort to abuse. However do respond to your abuse.

I always supply sources. Have limited my own requests to 3 after Rob was very slow & vague in supplying sources.

Everyone should concede or move on when appropriate. I said in one of my threads this month 'am happy to retract' & have said so before.

Anyway NGB did not say I should PM him when you are abusive. Hopefully I won't have to respond to your abuse in future which degrades threads on interesting subjects.

And I consider 'troll', 'trolling' abuse.

[ILB]

As said in my thread post, I am confident in my stance and therories. So don't need to resort to abuse. However do respond to your abuse.

I always supply sources. Have limited my own requests to 3 after Rob was very slow & vague in supplying sources.

Everyone should concede or move on when appropriate. I said in one of my threads this month 'am happy to retract' & have said so before.

Anyway NGB did not say I should PM him when you are abusive. Hopefully I won't have to respond to your abuse in future which degrades threads on interesting subjects.

And I consider 'troll', 'trolling' abuse.

" has the ex criminal scum got his justice for jeremy t shirt yet"

" criminal scum "

" thick criminal thug "

" steals for a living "

" alcoholic scumbag "

" bambers mate "

" coward "
" you and Bamber are really alike ", ( comparing me on par to what is at current a convicted murderer of five people ( including two children )

Well I consider that abuse, but i take it on the chin. People in glass houses  shouldn't throw stones Adam.

I think tit and troll are miniscule in comparison.

[Adam]

" has the ex criminal scum got his justice for jeremy t shirt yet"

" criminal scum "

" thick criminal thug "

" steals for a living "

" alcoholic scumbag "

" bambers mate "

" coward "
" you and Bamber are really alike ", ( comparing me on par to what is at current a convicted murderer of five people ( including two children )

Well I consider that abuse, but i take it on the chin. People in glass houses  shouldn't throw stones Adam.

I think tit and troll are miniscule in comparison.

As said several times in this thread, I am confident in my stance and threories So only respond to your abuse.

I don't need to use abuse as a tactic.

As a former Category A prisoner, maybe abuse is in your nature. But if you can't take it, don't dish it out.

And I also  consider 'tit' abuse.

[ILB]

As said several times in this thread, I am confident in my stance and threories So only respond to your abuse.

I don't need to use abuse as a tactic.

As a former Category A prisoner, maybe abuse is in your nature. But if you can't take it, don't dish it out.

And I also  consider 'tit' abuse.

As stated, there are examples of your abuse. I can take it.

Have respect for people who share an alternate view of the case to you. That simple really. If we were all singing from the same hymn sheet it would be a boring forum.