Why no Julie 10pm call mention in JBs first WS?

[ILB]

If anything it clears Bamber of directing JM what to put in her 8m8.85 statement, coupled with the little time they had coupled with police presence.

[Adam]

Cos it never happened?

He never freely admitted the call, he surmised it may have happened.

You are getting more desperate.

Julie said it happened in her first WS.

SB said it happened. Although I know you believe the police made her create a second false WS.

[Adam]

Bamber did eventually admit he had been sitting in his tractor that day.

As Julie said.

[Adam]

The 3 calls do merge well -

Call 1:

I have been thinking about it all day.

Tonights the night.

It's now or never.

You may hear from me later.

Call 2:

Everythings going well.

I haven't slept all night.

There is something wrong at the farm.

Call 3:

Don't go to work.

[ILB]

The 3 calls do merge well -

Call 1:

I have been thinking about it all day.

Tonights the night.

It's now or never.

You may hear from me later.

Call 2:

Everythings going well.

I haven't slept all night.

There is something wrong at the farm.

Call 3:

Don't go to work.

No they don't.

It's word against word.

Nothing recorded, no transcript. Nothing.

This is the case 40 years on.

You know this.

[Adam]

No they don't.

It's word against word.

Nothing recorded, no transcript. Nothing.

This is the case 40 years on.

You know this.

They merge well from Julie's detailed WS.

Bamber has refused to speak about the 3 calls he made.

You know this.

[Adam]

Not really her word V his.

Bamber agrees he made the calls but has refused to speak about them.

[ILB]

They merge well from Julie's detailed WS.

Bamber has refused to speak about the 3 calls he made.

You know this.

He detailed the two and three in his WS.

He surmised call 1 (10pm) when under arrest and jnterview a month later.

Nobody has a transcript. It's jezs word v Julie.

You know this.

[ILB]

Not really her word V his.

It very much is.

Such as Justice Drakes jury direction " do you believe Jeremy Bamber or do you believe Julie Mugford "

" Someone in this case is lying, and lying their heads off "

[ILB]

Bamber did eventually admit he had been sitting in his tractor that day.

As Julie said.

In fairness I don't understand why he no commented this question when it was his job duty anyway. In no way damaging.

Perhaps he felt he was getting led up the garden path.

[Adam]

It very much is.

Such as Justice Drakes jury direction " do you believe Jeremy Bamber or do you believe Julie Mugford "

" Someone in this case is lying, and lying their heads off "

Bamber & the CT have always refused to speak about his 3 calls.

So have to go by Julie's detailed account.

You know this.

[ILB]

You are getting more desperate.

Julie said it happened in her first WS.

SB said it happened. Although I know you believe the police made her create a second false WS.

Not at all.

If anything if clears Bamber of directing Julie for her WS 8.8.85 which you've long alleged.

[Adam]

Obviously Bamber's 10pm call was to help motivate himself.

The second was an update call.

The third was an instruction and telling her who was coming to pick her up.

[ILB]

Bamber & the CT have always refused to speak about his 3 calls.

So have to go by Julie's detailed account.

You know this.

What are you talking bollocks for.

As early as 7.8.85 he makes reference to 2 and 3 calls to Julie.

He surmised a 10pm phone call a month on when under arrest.

The documents are on this site. Why do you lie?

[ILB]

Obviously Bamber's 10pm call was to help motivate himself.

The second was an update call.

The third was an instruction and telling her who was coming to pick her up.

Motivate himself?

By ringing his bird in Lewisham?