Author Topic: Two moderators?  (Read 4600 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #60 on: February 06, 2025, 11:36:AM »

My partner's dog would run miles to 'pay court' to his latest quest, and, having done the deed, arrive home with his tail wagging and looking very pleased with himself. Sex, unlike actual hard work, never seems to phase!!

" never used to "  ;D
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #61 on: February 06, 2025, 11:42:AM »
" never used to "  ;D


Comes to us all, I'm afraid  :'(.........  ;D

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #62 on: February 10, 2025, 03:17:PM »
Still not sure what the CT are saying.

Are they saying the police took one silencer away & left one inside WHF before the relatives entered the house?

Strange thing for the police to do.

But nice of the CT to circulate a photo of a box with a silencer inside to the media.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #63 on: February 10, 2025, 03:30:PM »
If the CT are saying the prosecution did not mention there was another silencer in the gun cupboard with nothing on, not sure why that would have influenced the jury.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #64 on: February 10, 2025, 08:11:PM »
If the CT are saying the prosecution did not mention there was another silencer in the gun cupboard with nothing on, not sure why that would have influenced the jury.

The provenance and history of how the silencer was found and handled is bizarre to say the least, if it now turns out there were two and the jury were not told, to me it completely trashes the case.

What has always puzzled me is why Millar said it was sticky when found? Fingerprint testing?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2025, 08:12:PM by Rob_ »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #65 on: February 10, 2025, 08:53:PM »
The provenance and history of how the silencer was found and handled is bizarre to say the least, if it now turns out there were two and the jury were not told, to me it completely trashes the case.

What has always puzzled me is why Millar said it was sticky when found? Fingerprint testing?

Would you not expect a gun cupboard to have more than one silencer?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #66 on: February 10, 2025, 09:00:PM »
The provenance and history of how the silencer was found and handled is bizarre to say the least, if it now turns out there were two and the jury were not told, to me it completely trashes the case.

What has always puzzled me is why Millar said it was sticky when found? Fingerprint testing?

It was David Boutflour who said that, not Miller.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #67 on: February 10, 2025, 09:06:PM »
The provenance and history of how the silencer was found and handled is bizarre to say the least, if it now turns out there were two and the jury were not told, to me it completely trashes the case.

What has always puzzled me is why Millar said it was sticky when found? Fingerprint testing?

But you're not the CCRC/CoA.

Rivlin had the opportunity to challenge the chain of custody.  He chose not to. 

There were numerous bibles within the farmhouse but only one is relevant to the case.

I understand there were 2 or 3 identical silencers hanging around but only one is relevant to the case.

You're not thinking it through Rob.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline BarefootDanC

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #68 on: February 10, 2025, 09:38:PM »
But you're not the CCRC/CoA.

Rivlin had the opportunity to challenge the chain of custody.  He chose not to. 

There were numerous bibles within the farmhouse but only one is relevant to the case.

I understand there were 2 or 3 identical silencers hanging around but only one is relevant to the case.

You're not thinking it through Rob.

You are correct.

What's more, the argument seems to be that they needed to use 2 sound moderators in order to fabricate the evidence. One sound moderator had blood planted in it and the other one had red paint added to the end. Allegedly, "Glynis Howard didn't see red paint on the end"

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #69 on: February 11, 2025, 01:55:PM »
If the jury were made aware that the gun cupboard had a second moderator, that would not influence them.

Only one was used on the night.

But appreciate the CT have to keep the moderator in the media.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #70 on: February 11, 2025, 03:33:PM »
If the jury were made aware that the gun cupboard had a second moderator, that would not influence them.

Only one was used on the night.

But appreciate the CT have to keep the moderator in the media.

Police have said only one. If two or more, police will have lied.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #71 on: February 11, 2025, 05:16:PM »
Police have said only one. If two or more, police will have lied.

Only one what. Moderator used or moderator at WHF?

When did they say this?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #72 on: February 11, 2025, 06:46:PM »
Only one what. Moderator used or moderator at WHF?

When did they say this?

Moderator used / tested forensically. Ron Cook said it on television in 2012.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #73 on: February 11, 2025, 06:47:PM »
Moderator used / tested forensically. Ron Cook said it on television in 2012.

They would only test one moderator as only one had the blood & paint on.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Two moderators?
« Reply #74 on: February 11, 2025, 07:15:PM »
It was David Boutflour who said that, not Miller.

I know David, but in a interview on TV Millar also said this.