Jeremy's Campaign Team: People's view of them

[BarefootDanC]

I get the strong impression that even most Bamber supporters in this forum, have little regard for many of the Campaign Team theories.

For example, apparently:

* no-one in this forum thinks the blood in the silencer could be rabbit's blood
* I don't get the impression from another post that anyone believes their theory that the police caused the second shot to Sheila.
* few people defended the Campaign Team that there was a "great disclosure of 347,000 documents in 2011".

[ILB]

I think for many their aim would he that if Jeremy Bamber got an acquittal it would put them in the spotlight due to the case being high profile.

On the other hand it takes stamina to undertake such a task especially when there is no monetary reward for your efforts. Whether you believe they are misguided or not.

For me personally I am on the fence with Jeremy Bamber. I only watch the CT videos or anything on social media in regards to him due to a vested interest in Jeremy Bamber and his case.

But really it is just PR, the only thing that matters is the CCRC and the legal arena

[ILB]

Painting everyone black, and Jeremy Bamber whiter than white won't work.

There are plenty of other avenues for anyone who has an interest in the case to go down instead of just listening to the CT.

[Adam]

I get the strong impression that even most Bamber supporters in this forum, have little regard for many of the Campaign Team theories.

For example, apparently:

* no-one in this forum thinks the blood in the silencer could be rabbit's blood
* I don't get the impression from another post that anyone believes their theory that the police caused the second shot to Sheila.
* few people defended the Campaign Team that there was a "great disclosure of 347,000 documents in 2011".

Guest29835 claims there is a 5% chance of it being rabbits blood. For him that is enough to 'not convict'.

He did not give a source for the 5%.

[BarefootDanC]

Guest29835 claims there is a 5% chance of it being rabbits blood. For him that is enough to 'not convict'.

He did not give a source for the 5%.

Does he/she still post?

[Roch]

Does he/she still post?

It was QC Chevalier. Strange f****r. I used to defend him on here then he barred me from his own forum.

[ngb1066]

It was QC Chevalier. Strange f****r. I used to defend him on here then he barred me from his own forum.

He was certainly strange but also aggressive and at times offensive.  He received a permanent ban here.  He then set up his own forum and tried to persuade people here to leave and join him.  He copied all his own threads and posts from here and all the documents and images.  He insisted on people joining using their real name but he created a false identity for himself.  His forum is still online I believe but it is totally moribund.
 

[Roch]

He was certainly strange but also aggressive and at times offensive.  He received a permanent ban here.  He then set up his own forum and tried to persuade people here to leave and join him.  He copied all his own threads and posts from here and all the documents and images.  He insisted on people joining using their real name but he created a false identity for himself.  His forum is still online I believe but it is totally moribund.

He certainly had his flaws. Hard one to work out. Was capable of ripping the prosecution case apart, but still believed guilt.

[Curiosity]

He was certainly strange but also aggressive and at times offensive.  He received a permanent ban here.  He then set up his own forum and tried to persuade people here to leave and join him.  He copied all his own threads and posts from here and all the documents and images.  He insisted on people joining using their real name but he created a false identity for himself.  His forum is still online I believe but it is totally moribund.

Yep, still up and running with new posts as sparse as drifting tumbleweed but festooned with countless old ones from the same author masquerading as QCChevalier'/'Gascoigne'/'Guest29835'/Erik Narramore et al. He obviously gets a kick out of conversing with himself!

https://jeremybamberdiscussionforum.com/index.php

[BarefootDanC]

He was certainly strange but also aggressive and at times offensive.  He received a permanent ban here.  He then set up his own forum and tried to persuade people here to leave and join him.  He copied all his own threads and posts from here and all the documents and images.  He insisted on people joining using their real name but he created a false identity for himself.  His forum is still online I believe but it is totally moribund.

Am I right in thinking nobody in this forum considers that the rabbits blood could be possible?

[Roch]

Am I right in thinking nobody in this forum considers that the rabbits blood could be possible?

It used to be mentioned in the old days but seems to have died a death. I assume that if you were putting rabbits out of their misery then a sound moderator might be used in a contact shot. Maybe that's where the idea came from.

[snow66!]

It used to be mentioned in the old days but seems to have died a death. I assume that if you were putting rabbits out of their misery then a sound moderator might be used in a contact shot. Maybe that's where the idea came from.

Miller mentioned that in the TV prog, Roch!

[Rob_]

I get the strong impression that even most Bamber supporters in this forum, have little regard for many of the Campaign Team theories.

For example, apparently:

* no-one in this forum thinks the blood in the silencer could be rabbit's blood
* I don't get the impression from another post that anyone believes their theory that the police caused the second shot to Sheila.
* few people defended the Campaign Team that there was a "great disclosure of 347,000 documents in 2011".

One of the groupings is common with rabbits I believe, so bearing in mind one grouping was missing completely and two groupings were tested only once when two are required I don't think the view it was Sheila's blood in the silencer is a very strong one.

[BarefootDanC]

One of the groupings is common with rabbits I believe, so bearing in mind one grouping was missing completely and two groupings were tested only once when two are required I don't think the view it was Sheila's blood in the silencer is a very strong one.

What do you mean that "one group" was missing?

Regarding the blood in the moderator it was "tested and found to be human in origin".

[Rob_]

What do you mean that "one group" was missing?

Regarding the blood in the moderator it was "tested and found to be human in origin".

The PGM group was missing in the tests done on the flake, so of the 5 groups we only have four groups returning a result and two of these were only tested once and not twice as they should have been.

Also keep in mind how the silencer was treated, and I don't think the result is very reliable?