If you read his diary and his draft response to the Jury question. It becomes rather apparent he is not the smartest of people.
The same can be said for you.
If the blood matched none of the victims then there would be no arrest warrant and his blood would never be tested in the first place.
No idea where your 'thinking' is here.
Mind you, it has been alleged by the CT that he refused to give a DNA sample in 2001. I don't know if its true or not. But I do know AE and PB gave DNA samples in 2001.
Now you really are showing how idiotic you are.
There is no such thing as a DNA sample. I think you might mean a biological sample for DNA testing.
The reason AE and PB provided blood for DNA testing for the 2001/01 CoA hearing is that they are biologically related to June! RWB is not biologically related so there was no need for him to provide any biological samples.
At PM blood samples were taken from all victims. These blood samples were later destroyed along with most case related exhibits other than the rifle and silencer. Hence when DNA testing become available there was no biological sample left to test. Therefore it was agreed by the defence and prosecution that blood relatives would provide samples and statistical analysis applied.
In the case of June, PB and AE provided samples. In the case of SC her biological mother provided a sample. The CoA doc states:
490. Samples obtained from Sheila Caffell's natural mother and from other sources.