Author Topic: FAO Admin/Mods  (Read 705 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Curiosity

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 262
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2024, 06:03:PM »
I can confirm that it is possible for administrators to see IP addresses but as you know that is not conclusive in determining the identity or even location of a poster.  I was able to confirm that Munska and CC are not the same as I had other points of verification from before Muska registered.  I cannot give the same confirmation with others because I simply do not know.  There was certainly a strong belief that KE and CC were the same, based upon some strong indications, but I accept that this may be wrong.  There is also a belief that Curiosity and CC are the same but I accept that the evidence is far from conclusive.  It is difficult for the mods to deal with situations like this when do not have complete information.
Cambridge and I are not the same person, Neil -  Don't be swayed by the doubters/naysayers.
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2024, 06:05:PM »
Reply 4 confirms it is the same person. The phrase DHR being used within minutes of each other.

Suspect Curiosity was created 2 years after CC was created as CC was about to start posting as a supporter. Which she is doing now.

CC wanted someone to back up her new 'innocent' posts - herself.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2024, 06:12:PM »
Wouldn't believe what CC says.

Her foyer intro says she only found out about the case in 2020. Although she had been a member of Red as Holly since 2013.

She also posted to herself on Red as Holly & Colsville.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Curiosity

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 262
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2024, 06:13:PM »
It was an interesting analysis. I tend to think you have some similarities to Hartley. But not enough to be labelled Hartley.
I wonder if Hartley is well and still reads here?  We live at opposite ends of the country anyway, I think. 
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4163
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2024, 06:13:PM »
I put 20 random posts from CC into a txt file and put another random 20 posts from Curiosity into a another txt file.

I then uploaded them to OpenAi-GPT-4 and asked it if the contents of the two files are written by the same person. This was the response.


"The two texts you provided show several similarities that might suggest they are written by the same person, though it's not conclusive. Here are some key observations:

Tone and Style:

Both texts employ a conversational, somewhat informal tone. In both, the author addresses the reader directly ("Well done you for remembering!" and "Poor obsessive Adam"). This creates a similar, personal style of communication.

The usage of informal phrases and internet slang/emojis (":-X", "Such fun!"; "just wishful thinking", "Coz it never happened") appears in both documents, showing a relaxed, chatty writing style.
The writers in both texts display a confident tone and are sometimes dismissive of other people or viewpoints ("You are clueless", "sitting up 'till 3:20 last night to post a pile of tripe").

Discussion of Complex Scenarios:

Both documents involve detailed analysis of a case (presumably the same one), focusing on evidence, wound tracks, and rifle behavior. The author in both seems to enjoy delving into technical details about positions, ballistics, and court evidence.

Similar Vocabulary:

Both documents use specific, somewhat uncommon terms like "winder" (a part of a staircase) and "ejection port", and refer to rifle models like "Anschutz". This technical jargon and subject matter expertise seem consistent across both texts.

Similar Themes:

Both documents reflect frustration with people who have differing views on a specific case. In one, the author dismisses someone as "clueless" for not understanding their viewpoint, while in the other, they critique "Poor obsessive Adam" and accuse others of insecurity.

Interest in Judicial Matters:

The author in both texts shows an interest in judicial reviews and trials, referencing past cases and speculating about legal outcomes. This suggests a shared knowledge or focus on similar legal topics."


A good reason not to invest in AI stock. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Offline Curiosity

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 262
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2024, 06:15:PM »
Reply 4 confirms it is the same person. The phrase DHR being used within minutes of each other.

Suspect Curiosity was created 2 years after CC was created as CC was about to start posting as a supporter. Which she is doing now.

CC wanted someone to back up her new 'innocent' posts - herself.
Give it a rest, Adam.  You're making yourself look foolish.
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13097
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2024, 06:20:PM »
Reply 4 confirms it is the same person. The phrase DHR being used within minutes of each other.

Suspect Curiosity was created 2 years after CC was created as CC was about to start posting as a supporter. Which she is doing now.

CC wanted someone to back up her new 'innocent' posts - herself.

Curiosity account was created when people started noticing KE was CC. The account curiosity only started posting once KE was banned.

The account Munksa was registered the day after Jackie outed CC as HG. Munksa got very personal with Jackie from the get go and made the exact same arguments as CC on specific topics and they were both frequently complimenting each-other.




Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2024, 06:22:PM »
Oi oi. It's the CC & Curiosity double act again.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4163
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2024, 06:26:PM »
Curiosity account was created when people started noticing KE was CC. The account curiosity only started posting once KE was banned.

The account Munksa was registered the day after Jackie outed CC as HG. Munksa got very personal with Jackie from the get go and made the exact same arguments as CC on specific topics and they were both frequently complimenting each-other.

I honestly think you have some sort of mental illness David. 

You see connections when in fact none exist.  The above is very similar to your so-called 'forensic evidence breakthrough' where you saw all sorts of connections that no one else except you can see.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #24 on: September 25, 2024, 06:26:PM »
Curiosity account was created when people started noticing KE was CC. The account curiosity only started posting once KE was banned.

The account Munksa was registered the day after Jackie outed CC as HG. Munksa got very personal with Jackie from the get go and made the exact same arguments as CC on specific topics and they were both frequently complimenting each-other.

All very disturbing. As well as creating profiles & posting as a guilter when she is a supporter.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2024, 06:31:PM »
CC is now posting as a supporter. SJ fabricating the silencer.

That is fine as that is what she believes.

Hopefully she posts as CC & does not bring in Curiosity. It doesn't assist her.

Plenty of people will respond to her posts. From both sides.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4163
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2024, 06:42:PM »
CC is now posting as a supporter. SJ fabricating the silencer.

That is fine as that is what she believes.

Hopefully she posts as CC & does not bring in Curiosity. It doesn't assist her.

Plenty of people will respond to her posts. From both sides.

If this continues I am sure those who come here to debate the case will just stop posting.  It will be you and David mass debating each other. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2223
Re: FAO Admin/Mods
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2024, 10:23:PM »
If this continues I am sure those who come here to debate the case will just stop posting.  It will be you and David mass debating each other.

The posts referring to you and Curiosity 'meeting at a gig' with all the double entendres; didn't help the situation. You should know it doesn't take much to activate the detective prowess of certain posters (and yes, that was sarcasm).