« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nicholas Milbank article 2013  (Read 547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5002
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2024, 11:59:AM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on August 30, 2024, 11:19:AM
No, and to say further A Levels suggests a continuation of previous qualifications. However, I don't wish to disparage police and he seems to have made a success of his life. I do wish the ambiguities raised in the New Yorker article could be clarified.

So far I have only skim read the New Yorker article.  What ambiguities are you referring to?
Logged
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 19375
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2024, 12:13:PM »
Quote from: Cambridgecutie on August 30, 2024, 11:59:AM
So far I have only skim read the New Yorker article.  What ambiguities are you referring to?
The usual things: the purported telephone call made from the White House at 6:09am, the two silencers being merged into one, the moving of the bible. https://www.thejusticegap.com/bamber-significant-new-evidence-revealed-in-whitehouse-farms-murders/
Logged

Online Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5002
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2024, 02:03:PM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on August 30, 2024, 12:13:PM
The usual things: the purported telephone call made from the White House at 6:09am, the two silencers being merged into one, the moving of the bible. https://www.thejusticegap.com/bamber-significant-new-evidence-revealed-in-whitehouse-farms-murders/

But you seem certain of Bamber's guilt?
Logged
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Online Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5002
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2024, 02:13:PM »
Quote from: ILB on August 30, 2024, 11:07:AM
To be honest it doesn't matter what his background is. Whether he enjoys skiing holidays in France or can juggle. What only matters is his relevance to the case or Jeremy Bamber.

Agreed but if he is inclined towards being untruthful, embellishing etc it surely follows he might not be the most reliable witness!  Especially given it is in the parish mag where he is a parishoner!  If I was that way inclined, which I am not, I would be fearful of the bearded man in the sky coming to get me!
Logged
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4525
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2024, 03:57:PM »
Quote from: Cambridgecutie on August 30, 2024, 10:45:AM
Didn't seem to stop paedophile priests and sadistic nuns.

I wonder if that's a typo/error?  A levels are normally completed circa 18 yoa with 3 subjects.  And I've never heard of an A level in British Construction. 

Sounds a bit of fantasist along the lines of Paul Harrison.

I read that Cc a 5 grade A O levels?
Logged

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17128
Re: Nicholas Milbank article 2013
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2024, 05:45:PM »
Quote from: Cambridgecutie on August 30, 2024, 02:13:PM
...but if he is inclined towards being untruthful, embellishing etc it surely follows he might not be the most reliable witness!

That doesn't really fit with what he's saying though does it?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »