Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?

[ILB]

No, she had moved on post-murders, was steadfast in her loyalty, which worked to her detriment, until finally she was able to extricate herself from a monster.

Jeremy Bamber isn't a monster. He is a human being like me and you.

[ILB]

Different opinions on Julie from a couple of guilters.

Adam always seemed pro Julie, " Florence nightingale" " naive young girl " but has seemed to adopt a " Bamber and Julie bonnie and Clyde approach recently.

Steve is still vehemently the pro guardian angel Julie, which is fine.

[Adam]

Different opinions on Julie from a couple of guilters.

Adam always seemed pro Julie, " Florence nightingale" " naive young girl " but has seemed to adopt a " Bamber and Julie bonnie and Clyde approach recently.

Steve is still vehemently the pro guardian angel Julie, which is fine.

Just go by her WS & court testimony.

Also take into account her age and that she was in a situation no one had ever been in before.

Good luck in finding the brick that brings the wall crashing down in her WS. Her lawyers couldn't.

[ILB]

EP never went into this on a holy Julie mantra

Ostensibly believed Julie was as complicit as Bamber.

If circumstances had presented themselves differently they'd have happily put both Bamber and Mugford in the dock.

[ILB]

Just go by her WS & court testimony.

Also take into account her age and that she was in a situation no one had ever been in before.

Good luck in finding the brick that brings the wall crashing down in her WS. Her lawyers couldn't.

As said I've found many discrepancies.

What brick am I looking for? What are you getting at ?

[ILB]

Also take into account her age and that she was in a situation no one had ever been in before.

If she was happy beforehand and complicit that makes no difference.

Bamber was only three years older.

[Adam]

As said I've found many discrepancies.

What brick am I looking for? What are you getting at ?

Her lawyers were looking for a loose brick that would bring the wall crashing down - Wilkes.

They couldn't find one & admitted her WS had a 'ring of truth' to it.

Good luck in finding the loose brick 39 years later. You need to do better than Julie knowing some dates.

[ILB]

Her lawyers were looking for a loose brick that would bring the wall crashing down - Wilkes.

They couldn't find one & admitted her WS had a 'ring of truth' to it.

Good luck in finding the loose brick 39 years later. You need to do better than Julie knowing some dates.

Surely you mean his lawyers. Rivlin and Lawson put their clients case forward. In regards to Bamber and Julie as a specific it was literally word v word. Justice drake himself commenting upon it

You are quoting Wilkes, an author who wrote a book without references with a view to make profit.

I did enjoy the book though

[Adam]

Would like to know the date of Fieldings article in The Sun.

I'm sure that would have influenced Julie in approaching the police.

[Adam]

Doubt that Julie was pro active in encouraging Bamber.

She would know once he had money he wouldn't want to stay with her. It was also killing men, women and children.

However if she was pro active, Bamber will be gutted. He did all the dirty work, then Julie says 'nothing to do with me guv' to save her skin.

[ILB]

Doubt that Julie was pro active in encouraging Bamber.

She would know once he had money he wouldn't want to stay with her. It was also killing men, women and children.

However if she was pro active, Bamber will be gutted. He did all the dirty work, then Julie says 'nothing to do with me guv' to save her skin.

Can't grass her. Would be pointless for him.

Nothing to gain. Putting Julie away won't bring him freedom. He's whole life tariff.

[David1819]

No woman would perjure herself so seriously with a 23 page WS and several days testifying in court.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/woman-whose-bogus-rape-claim-landed-man-a-seven-year-prison-sentence-jailed-a3619441.html

🤡

[David1819]

Surely you mean his lawyers. Rivlin and Lawson put their clients case forward. In regards to Bamber and Julie as a specific it was literally word v word. Justice drake himself commenting upon it

You are quoting Wilkes, an author who wrote a book without references with a view to make profit.

I did enjoy the book though

The "ring of truth" quote comes from the following passage of the Judges summing up -

"Approach the evidence of Julie Mugford with a great degree of caution. Ask yourselves whether her evidence generally had the ring of truth about it."

This has somehow been distorted by Adam into being an admission from Jeremys defence. 

[Adam]

The "ring of truth" quote comes from the following passage of the Judges summing up -

"Approach the evidence of Julie Mugford with a great degree of caution. Ask yourselves whether her evidence generally had the ring of truth about it."

This has somehow been distorted by Adam into being an admission from Jeremys defence. 

It is called a judge's summing up.

It is also in Wilkes's book.

[Adam]

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/woman-whose-bogus-rape-claim-landed-man-a-seven-year-prison-sentence-jailed-a3619441.html

🤡

That is a good point. Julie could have made a false assault claim instead.