Julie's WS is very convincing.
Long, detailed and completed the day after she approached the police.
Ninety nine per cent is not disputed. Dates, times, locations & people she was with can & will have been checked.
Bamber really struggles with the other 1% where she says he spoke about the massacre. A lot of this information she could have only got from Bamber.
He agrees she had sleeping tablets and refuses to talk about his 10pm and 3pm calls. The police told him Julie was right about the lockable from outside window.
All he can do is very optimistically claim she made & stood by such a serious accusation because he 'jilted her'. Although she left him on the 27th August 1985.