Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?

[ILB]

I doubt Julie encouraged pre massacre. It was killing men, women and children.

But she didn't leave him or tell the relatives or police. She also made a suggestion and let him use her sleeping tablets.

So a passive accomplice for a crime she never thought would happen.

Are you beginning to believe the Jez and Julie in league together theory ?

If I remember from previous debate you believed Julie totally innocent.

I'm not championing it by the way, but believe it may have happened

[Adam]

I understand Maxine Carr going to prison.

She helped clean up the crime scene, gave a false alibi and lied in police interviews.

Julie was just told 'don't go to work'.

[ILB]

Julie's WS is 23 pages.

Both sides agree 22 pages are true.

The page worth which Bamber disputes regards him discussing the massacre.

The problem Bamber has is a lot of the massacre information Julie could have only got from Bamber.

There is Jeremy's version

There is Julie's version

And then there is the truth.

I for one would have loved to been a fly on the wall in their conversations pre massacre

[ILB]

I understand Maxine Carr going to prison.

She helped clean up the crime scene, gave a false alibi and lied in police interviews.

Julie was just told 'don't go to work'.

I think Maxine Carr believed Huntley to be innocent. And wanted to protect him from accusation in fairness.

[Adam]

Are you beginning to believe the Jez and Julie in league together theory ?

If I remember from previous debate you believed Julie totally innocent.

I'm not championing it by the way, but believe it may have happened

Have always gone by her WS, interviews and court testimony.

A passive accomplice for a crime she never thought would happen.

Then returning to London on the 27th August to tell 5 people and the police.

[ILB]

Have always gone by her WS, interviews and court testimony.

A passive accomplice for a crime she never thought would happen.

Then returning to London on the 27th August to tell 5 people and the police.

" Passive accomplice "

She was either totally disgusted or on board.

[ILB]

Then returning to London on the 27th August to tell 5 people and the police.

Either in my opinion

" I can't go on knowing what he's done having killed those two small boys and his sister and parents he's pure evil"

Or

" I'm not going to get the life I wanted to live "

[ILB]

I find it hard to tally a shocked girl who has realised her boyfriend was a cold hearted family killer for monetary gain and then mere hours after agree to identify the two small children he killed

Isn't it correct she volunteered as well?

[ngb1066]

Why should she be in prison?

Pre massacre she can say she didn't believe him.

Post massacre she approached the police a month later.

I have posted an analysis of this in detail in the past, in particular in fractious exchanges with Steve_uk several years ago.  Look the posts up if you want but I cannot be bothered to go through it all again.

[Adam]

I have posted an analysis of this in detail in the past, in particular in factious exchanges with Steve_uk several years ago.  Look the posts up if you want but I cannot be bothered to go through it all again.

Thank you.

The courts and police didn't believe she was worthy of a prison sentence.

[Adam]

Either in my opinion

" I can't go on knowing what he's done having killed those two small boys and his sister and parents he's pure evil"

Or

" I'm not going to get the life I wanted to live "

She just wanted to return to her job.

[ILB]

Thank you.

The courts and police didn't believe she was worthy of a prison sentence.

Your not going to jail the star witness in a trial of a man charged with five counts or murder.

[ILB]

She just wanted to return to her job.

He want controlling her.

He was more interested in other people

[Adam]

Do you think if Bamber confessed and there was no trial, Julie would have got a prison sentence?

[ILB]

Do you think if Bamber confessed and there was no trial, Julie would have got a prison sentence?

What for ?

Chequebook offences or his accomplice ?