Author Topic: Latest TikTok: Sound moderator allegedly contained David Boutfour's blood  (Read 401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 19174
https://www.tiktok.com/@justice4jeremybamber/video/7394876006730943776?_r=1&_t=8oGcfZUYeO0
Where's the evidence that David and Pamela's blood was found inside the silencer? It's also incorrect to say Sheila's DNA wasn't in the silencer: it may have been (2002 appeal Point 497 ii).

Offline BarefootDanC

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
Where's the evidence that David and Pamela's blood was found inside the silencer? It's also incorrect to say Sheila's DNA wasn't in the silencer: it may have been (2002 appeal Point 497 ii).

It is supposedly demonstrated by the document which they show.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2222
Where's the evidence that David and Pamela's blood was found inside the silencer? It's also incorrect to say Sheila's DNA wasn't in the silencer: it may have been (2002 appeal Point 497 ii).
i) Sheila Caffell's DNA may have been in the sound moderator but it was not possible to conclude one way or the other whether it was;

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16989
It is supposedly demonstrated by the document which they show.

The scientist drew a crude sketch of the baffle plates and indicated where blood groupings were located, noting down the blood groupings alongside.

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2223
The scientist drew a crude sketch of the baffle plates and indicated where blood groupings were located, noting down the blood groupings alongside.

It's probably one of the documents that they got from Mike  ;D

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4163
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2222
Not sure what point the vid is endeavouring to make?
Good to see you back Cutie, although i might be accused of supporting you now.

Offline BarefootDanC

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
Not sure what point the vid is endeavouring to make?

It is trying to claim the blood evidence is ambiguous and/or fabricated

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Not sure what point the vid is endeavouring to make?

They are claiming that DRB's blood was in the SM in part because his DNA was detected in the SM as well. Since he had not been shot there must have been contamination by an unknown event. Similarly RB had not been shot and the same type of contamination could have occurred. Since 8% of the population are the same blood type as SC  and RB it could have been another case of contamination. Thus they are saying that the blood found in the SM might not have come from SC and it too is the result of a contamination event. At least that Is my interpretation.

It is an argument but how did they know DRB's DNA was found in the SM?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13096
They are claiming that DRB's blood was in the SM in part because his DNA was detected in the SM as well.

What are they basing this claim on?

Pamela Boutflour and Ann Eaton gave DNA samples in 2001. No record of DRB or RWB doing so.

The only way they could conceivably discover and prove this is if they managed to -

1. Convert the DNA info from both or either AE and PB into a raw CSV format.
2. Do the same for a DNA sample found in the moderator.
3. Upload the CSVs to GedMatch and it concludes the unknown DNA is from a sibling and or child of the other two profiles.