Snippet from one of today's articles...
The report also details a reluctance to go back to the original police file, instead accepting the prosecution file presented in court. Henley said: “From what I have seen in this case there seems more of a reluctance to obtain the police file than the files from [the prosecution and other bodies]. The police file will often contain the most important material, particularly if there have been disclosure failings"
Well well well.
This why I will maintain an innocent stance until all the withheld information is released and that includes the original case file from when it was four murders and a suicide. If they knock JB back on his latest submission you can bet your bottom dollar he will make a song and dance about disclosure. Grounds 6 and 7 in the current submission have issues relating to disclosure.
He has multiple issues of disclosure involved in his case and it has been raised in Parliament.
In response to HL1475 - Because Essex police Chief Constable has refused disclosure both to the court, to Jeremy and also to the CCRC we are asking that a higher authority intervene, namely the Justice Minister or Home Secretary responsible for policing but it seems this has been ignored and the Chief Constable doesn't have to be held accountable to the Government.
In response to HL1476 - We have evidence disclosed post 2002 appeal which shows directly that a large amount of material was not disclosed we have specifically identified this in our disclosure booklet and so this cannot be viewed as coming under the Kevin Nunn ruling as 'speculative'. Also we have statements proving that evidence was destroyed by police so that is in direct contrast to the response made by Baroness Williams of Trafford.
These voices will no doubt be raised to add weight to his situation.
