However what ever they asked would be answered. He new he was innocent. There would be no need to change his story. He saw no need to embellish his answers and I believe he had a solicitor for some of his questioning. Why, to his way of thinking, would he think it necessary to add the sighting out of the blue. He may not have known what Bews and co had said in their statements. He may not have seen what they originally say they saw and if so he may not have thought it relevant.
So we agree that he never mentioned the window sighting in his interviews, and we now agree he was arrested and cautioned under arrest and it was put to him did he murder 5 members of his family,
Mike said Bamber told him this.................Jeremy said that this figure was stood there in that position for between two and three minutes, before all of a sudden, and quite unexpectedly, the figure started to move from the left hand side of the bedroom window, across it, and out of sight to the right of the window,
Do you think this is something you would forget about when acused of killing your entire family or think not relivant to mention?