So lets go over your theory, you accuse the raid team/police, raid team 2 or Dr Craig, of moving Neville from in front of the AGA to burn material in the AGA after the raid team shot June? That's an accusation against the Police on a forum and i'm quite entitled to respond to such a baseless accusation how i see fit, and if i think it's Bonkers/bullshit i will say so, have you got it Sunshine my old Boy. I personally think some of your accusations are Bordering liable, they are not only suggestions they are accusations. i don't like the way you accuse without evidence it's as simple as that BOY. you even accuse Peter Vanezis of a cover up without evidence...............BUBO'S words, I believe PV assisted with the coverup but not the latter framing of JB.
You are well out of order. I have been investigating this potential MOJ since 2009 and have been posting my thinking since 2019. I have one major problem. I cannot understand why EP after all these years still refuses to disclose a very large number of documents despite court orders and a highly detailed request from the CT which lists these items as they can produce evidence that they exist. These documents are in the form of a booklet and can be found here.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/m2bg7o208f2pivkufoo66/MEP-booklet-copy-docx.pdf?rlkey=owoy6pie44fffa992bwaoyabd&e=1&dl=0In addition PII has been used to prevent disclosure of some material. This mechanism is more usually applied where issues of national security are involved and one must question as to why this has been used in a criminal case where there is no foreseeable reason for its application. It is can also be used to obtain information from citizens offering them immunity for any potential prosecution as a result of them disclosing information.
This being the case I decided that it would be pertinent to construct an alternative narrative from that put forward by the police. This narrative is deeper and wider than the issue of the AGA and the burns.
For those that are interested I have set out my thinking on a whole range of issues. Much of this has been posted before your return to the forum.
Here is a list of the issues I have trouble with.
It is possible to make lists of case issues from both a guilt and innocence perspective. The publishing of long lists requiring answers is a tactic that David1819 often criticises and is called a Gish gallop, if I remember correctly. He would use this term when Adam produced his huge lists.
Still, what is sauce for the Goose is sauce for the Gander.
I list all the following as what I see as potential problems with JB’s conviction. It is not a full list by any means. I have posted about all of these at various times.
I have also raised doubts about the integrity of PV who from my perspective appears to have assisted EP in the first instance to cover up an accidental shooting only to be dragged into a conspiracy to frame JB.
The original SIO was Chief superintendent Harris, and he was at the scene before Taff. His statement states that he was attending a shooting incident not a siege and he too could have checked the security situation before Taff arrived. He also says SC had been shot ONCE. Evidence that is supported by Dr Craig.
There are many examples of witness statement manipulation that I have presented and the police were allowed to use composite statements which were unsigned. I believe JB's legal team have raised this with the IOPC and that it has been shown that this process has been abused by EP
1 NB’s body was moved/staged as evidenced by the Aga Burns
2 SC’s body was also staged as determined by Ismail. Pictures show she was placed on a perculier bedside rug and that efforts were made to conceal this.
3 SC was shot by more than one rifle (Brno) as evidenced by the swapping of PV20 by MF and who made the second shot?
4 The police retrieved a SM on the day and covered this up as evidenced by the Blue Socks argument. There were two SM's as now can be proved. The original belonged to AP and was different from the one that the family and EP used to construct a swap.
5 The blood flake was introduced after the Blood tests by the defence expert Patrick Lincoln had cast doubt of the composition of the blood in the SM and it was not present when RWC dismantled the silencer before it was sent to the FSS.
6 A demonstrably false timeline was constructed to suggest JB’s call was at 03.36 and other statements were altered to support this.
7 The blood stains on the bed are not consistent with June being shot in bed.
8 There is no pool of blood by June’s head.
9 A fake Xray was produced to suggest that a rifle shot to SC had fragmented.
10 There is a photo showing only one shot to the neck of SC. I showed this to Roch and NGB. In a forum message. Unfortunately, since I presented it and discussed it on the forum and the source it has been deleted from the Net.
https://bambermugfordaccomplicestomurder.blogspot.com/2012/03/httpmiscarriageofjustice.html11 A single round from the 30 on the kitchen work top was not sent to MF. I say it was used to replace the round that killed June.
12 Why does the Samples list for PV25 not agree with the autopsy text?
13 Why has the Samples list for PV20 been changed?
14 Why did the police withhold a photo at trial which showed that the kitchen window was firmly shut?
15 Why did PC Bird produce two witness statements on the same day with different contents? This was part of the Blue Socks argument. EP sought to disguise the finding of a SM on the day. He also changed DB1 to a soil sample and claimed that the fire debris came from the fire pit and not the Aga. This is false since the blue socks were found in the house.
16 The evidence suggests that the chin contact shot to SC was made without the SM destroying the back spatter argument. The neck shot was not a contact shot as described by MF and PV
17 The items under the heading fire debris consist of material that could have been used in a cover up. Namely a slip on shoe, parts of a plastic Macintosh, scarf, pieces of blanket and an overcoat. Why were these found in the Aga?
Finally I would argue the following. If my narrative is wrong EP can easily dispel its veracity by releasing the mountain of nondisclosed documents. Further since the main physical evidence against JB was the SM there can be no harm in disclosing this documentation.
Non disclosure is the single biggest cause of MOJ's
So spare me your bullying rants. I will not be swayed by your obnoxious posting. I am happy to argue these points free of swearing and insinuations about my mental capacity. I have told you what my views are. I have told you several times to examine my narrative in detail. Feel free to engage in serious debate.
I may not be correct in all aspects but I would point out that I suggested that the burns to NB were made by the AGA six years ago and whether you agree with PB or not his findings suggest that I may well be correct on this issue.
