Author Topic: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial  (Read 1422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #45 on: May 25, 2024, 10:25:PM »
Human error. It was after 3am.

Human error? I am talking about Wests statements written after the event?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #46 on: May 25, 2024, 10:27:PM »
Mike drove to WHF in 7 minutes. This was the long route via TD. Mike drove it at an average speed.

Suspect it took Bamber 10 minutes as he drove it very slowly. So would have left his cottage around 3.40am.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 10:28:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #47 on: May 25, 2024, 10:28:PM »
Mike drove to WHF in 7 minutes. This was the long route via TD. Mike drove it at an average speed.

Suspect it took Bamber 10 minutes as he drove it very slowly. So would have left his cottahe around 3.40am.

What has this got to do with West producing statements one stating 3.26 and the other 3.36?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #48 on: May 25, 2024, 10:31:PM »
What has this got to do with West producing statements one stating 3.26 and the other 3.36?

You know Bamber didn't phone West at 3.36am. Then speak for 10 minutes.

He was passed by Bews before 3.46am!
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #49 on: May 25, 2024, 10:33:PM »
Wests statement

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #50 on: May 25, 2024, 10:33:PM »
What has this got to do with West producing statements one stating 3.26 and the other 3.36?

You also know Nevill didn't phone West at 3.36am & speak for 10 minutes.

That would give Sheila 2 minutes to achieve everything. Even Wonder Woman would struggle.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #51 on: May 25, 2024, 10:36:PM »
You also know Nevill didn't phone West at 3.36am & speak for 10 minutes.

That would give Sheila 2 minutes to achieve everything. Even Wonder Woman would struggle.

So why does West say 3.36 in his statement and Bews says they left at 3.45?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #52 on: May 25, 2024, 10:37:PM »
Bamber phoned West. At 3.26am.

Both sides agreed with that at trial.

Decades later Bamber claimed Nevill phoned West. This is properganda for gullible and passionate supporters. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #53 on: May 25, 2024, 10:39:PM »
Bamber phoned West. At 3.26am.

Both sides agreed with that at trial.

Decades later Bamber claimed Nevill phoned West. This is properganda for gullible and passionate supporters.

So why does West say 3.36 in his statement which ties up with Bews saying they left at 3.45 why are they lying?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #54 on: May 25, 2024, 10:39:PM »
So why does West say 3.36 in his statement and Bews says they left at 3.45?

You know to get to WHF from Witham would take more than 3 minutes.

Vehicles were despatched near the end of Bamber's 3.26am call to West - 3.35am/3.36am.

The document on page 1 shows this.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 10:40:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #55 on: May 25, 2024, 10:41:PM »
So why does West say 3.36 in his statement and Bews says they left at 3.45?

You know Nevill didn't phone West at 3.36am & speak for 10 minutes.

That would give Sheila 2 minutes to achieve everything. Even Wonder Woman would struggle.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #56 on: May 25, 2024, 10:42:PM »
You know to get to WHF from Witham would take more than 3 minutes.

Vehicles were despatched near the end of Bamber's 3.26am call to West - 3.35am/3.36am.

The document on page 1 shows this.

Yes I know so why the differing statements?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #57 on: May 25, 2024, 10:43:PM »
So why does West say 3.36 in his statement which ties up with Bews saying they left at 3.45 why are they lying?

You know Bamber didn't phone West at 3.36am. Then speak for 10 minutes.

He was passed by Bews before 3.46am and arrived at WHF at 3.50am!
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 40981
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #58 on: May 25, 2024, 10:45:PM »
Yes I know so why the differing statements?

Come to think of it, I did see a spelling mistake Julie's diary.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4373
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #59 on: May 25, 2024, 10:46:PM »
You know Bamber didn't phone West at 3.36am. Then speak for 10 minutes.

He was passed by Bews before 3.46am and arrived at WHF at 3.50am!

I don't know? now explain West saying 3.36 in his statement and Bews saying they LEFT at 3.45

Thanks