Author Topic: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial  (Read 2484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #30 on: May 25, 2024, 09:37:PM »
Well Bews says it was 3.45 when as a result of information received etc they left for WHF so what is the problem with passing Bamber on the way?

The log on page 1 says cars were despatched at 3.35am and 3.36am.

Arriving at WHF at 3.48am.

Obviously Bamber needs to explain how Bews can pass him while he is still at Goldhanger talking to West.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 09:37:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #31 on: May 25, 2024, 09:39:PM »
And why did West despatch police cars during Bamber's 3.36am call, when cars had already been despatched during Nevill's call. At 3.35am & 3.36am.

And did these extra cars get lost? Because they never arrived at WHF.

Why do Bews and Saxby's statements differ so much? Bews says they left at 3.45 and Saxby says 3.35.

Why does this ten minute difference keep cropping up all over the place?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #32 on: May 25, 2024, 09:43:PM »
And why did both Nevill and Bamber phone a police station over 20 miles away. Instead of 999.

And why did Nevill not take the rifle off Sheila. Instead of spending half the night ringing Bamber's AM & then another 10 minutes chatting to West?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #33 on: May 25, 2024, 10:00:PM »
And why did both Nevill and Bamber phone a police station over 20 miles away. Instead of 999.

And why did Nevill not take the rifle off Sheila. Instead of spending half the night ringing Bamber's AM & then another 10 minutes chatting to West?

So why did FE call for help when an unarmed Sheila flew into a rage?

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #34 on: May 25, 2024, 10:04:PM »
And why did both Nevill and Bamber phone a police station over 20 miles away. Instead of 999.

And why did Nevill not take the rifle off Sheila. Instead of spending half the night ringing Bamber's AM & then another 10 minutes chatting to West?

If guilty he would have done absolutely no reason why not.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #35 on: May 25, 2024, 10:05:PM »
Nevill would just take the rifle off Sheila. Unless he was a weak Frank Spencer. Which is impossible.

Sheila had no strength, balance, co ordination or rifle experience.

It was a rifle for shooting rabbits. Not a shot gun.

Situation negated in 10 seconds.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #36 on: May 25, 2024, 10:08:PM »
Nevill would just take the rifle off Sheila. Unless he was a weak Frank Spencer. Which is impossible.

Sheila had no strength, balance, co ordination or rifle experience.

It was a rifle for shooting rabbits. Not a shot gun.

Situation negated in 10 seconds.

So why did FE call for help if Sheila was this bad?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #37 on: May 25, 2024, 10:09:PM »
So impossible -

Nevill phoned West at 3.26am. Spoke for 10 minutes. Got cars despatched at 3.35am & 3 36am.

Then Bamber spoke to West at 3.36am.  For 10 minutes. Got more cars despatched. Which never arrived.Bamber being passed by Bews while simultaneously speaking to West.

But supporters will support it. 
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 10:10:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #38 on: May 25, 2024, 10:13:PM »
So impossible -

Nevill phoned West at 3.26am. Spoke for 10 minutes. Got cars despatched at 3.35am & 3 36am.

Then Bamber spoke to West at 3.36am.  For 10 minutes. Got more cars despatched. Which never arrived.Bamber being passed by Bews while simultaneously speaking to West.

But supporters will support it.

If West is so lily white why does he hand copy his log when he could use a photocopier?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #39 on: May 25, 2024, 10:13:PM »
So why did FE call for help if Sheila was this bad?

You know you wouldn't be a coward and let yourself and your family die & yourself get brutally beaten.

Sheila had no strength, balance, co ordination or rifle experience.

It was a rifle for shooting rabbits.

Situation resolved in 10 seconds. Even by Frank Spencer. 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #40 on: May 25, 2024, 10:15:PM »
If West is so lily white why does he hand copy his log when he could use a photocopier?

Agree he should have got 10 years for that.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #41 on: May 25, 2024, 10:17:PM »
Agree he should have got 10 years for that.

Not sure about 10 years but why did he do it?

Also why does he produce two statements one with 3.26 and the other 3.36 just another mistake?
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 10:20:PM by Rob_ »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #42 on: May 25, 2024, 10:20:PM »
Only possible scenario -

3.10am - Nevill calls Bamber  (Unproven).

3.26am - Bamber calls the police.

3.35am & 3.36am - Cars despatched from Witham.

3.48am & 3.50am - Police & Bamber arrive at WHF.

----------

Trying to fit in a 10 minute call from Nevill to the police is impossible.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4613
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #43 on: May 25, 2024, 10:22:PM »
Only possible scenario -

3.10am - Nevill calls Bamber  (Unproven).

3.26am - Bamber calls the police.

3.35am & 3.36am - Cars despatched from Witham.

3.48am & 3.50am - Police & Bamber arrive at WHF.

----------

Trying to fit in a 10 minute call from Nevill to the police is impossible.

I agree it's difficult but please explain West's statements one saying 3.26 and the other 3.36?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43333
Re: Supposed non-disclosure of the radio log at the trial
« Reply #44 on: May 25, 2024, 10:24:PM »
I agree it's difficult but please explain West's statements one saying 3.26 and the other 3.36?

Human error. It was after 3am.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.