Thanks Grahame! I don't see the point on arguing unless you have read all the "facts", I use that word a bit loosely because it seems most of them have not been disclosed, or omitted by the police, I am not one of the I love Jeremy brigade as I don't know him, the only thing I am interested in as I'm sure most of you are is the truth, be it guilty or innocent, after I have read through all the information I will be in a better position to make a decision. at this moment in time I would say I am 60-40 in favour of innocent. My brother is a Barrister actually but he is away at the moment but I am looking forward to showing him this case and getting his thoughts from a legal point of view.
Work it out shaman. Those morons over on the guilty page will tell you that how can 100's of people like the Julie Mugford. the family and all the police be wrong and Bamber right. Surely all these people aren't deceiving people. It is surely incredible and unbelievable.
But that is not what we are saying is it? It doesn't take many people to lie in order to persuade many others to believe that lie. One police officer can lie and what do the others do? They say "Surely he is one of our own, he won't lie to us".
But even with the so called evidence that was presented at the original trial. A"proven" lier and a dodgy silencer that had the Bourflour's big ol' graspers mauling it about. With that evidence alone the Jury should never have brought in a verdict of not guilty. But through clever manipulation by influential key witnesses the court was deceived into finding Bamber guilty. It is that injustice that we are seeking to put right and the real culprits put behind bars. Those wicked liers who twisted the evidence and won over the "emotions" of 10 of the jury so they voted guilty.
