Israel have a very competent air force. Iran has thousands upon thousands of missiles and drones. Both countries have air defence systems. Both countries probably have electronic jamming technology. Iran is vast. Israel by comparison is tiny. I think Iran could cause devastation in specific areas of Israel, if it mass targeted those areas. In the long run I think Iran would win. Israel's population are not used to witnessing mass devastation in their own country.
All true, Roch. Iran's advantages over Israel are vast. Israel's Air Force however cannot penetrate Iran's defences as they found out on their last venture. Iran's missiles, on the other hand can and have, easily overcome Israel Air Defence. David fails to understand, and doesn't attempt to understand the strategies, moves and countermoves that have unfolded over the years. If you seek confirmation bias then that is what you will find, which is exactly what David does.
To address David's latest piece of misinformation in which he claims, via the notoriously unreliable ISW, that Israel attacked Iran without consequence. Much like his claim of international oversight and inspections at Dimona-it never happened. The failed aborted attack was much discussed at the time and it is clear that Israeli jets turned back before entering Iranian airspace after being locked onto by Iranian AD. The ordnance that the Israeli's prematurely dropped before turning tail was found all over neighbouring countries. There is no evidence provided by the Israelis of anything hit, no footage, pictures or anything and what was released was soon identified as old footage from elsewhere.
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/israel-attack-iran-failure/ The longer term strategy of Iran, for the wilfully obtuse such as David and Steve, is to make the US presence in the Middle East untenable. With US withdrawal, then Israel becomes untenable. Iran don't want hot war, not because they couldn't win it-they could and would but it would also be hugely damaging to them and any victory would be the epitome of a Pyrrhic victory. The longer term attritional strategy is to gradually bleed out the enemy whilst always carrying enough threat to prevent the enemy launching a hot war. It is clear to objective observers that the threat posed by Empire is massive air power and equally clear that this threat has been neutralised and countered by superior Air Defence and missile technology. Now it's just a matter of strategic patience.