Strange that medical professionals at the time cast doubt on that assumption. As to #3, you have constructed a false narrative based on Julie not coming forward for a month, a time when she was thinking things through and, as Adam points out, told five people of the truth of the horror. The rest is just a garbled rehash of semi-truths, misunderstandings and Poppy Meze speculation. Where is the proof Julie did drugs before she met Jeremy, that she ever went to Canada as a student, that she ever read the newspapers in detail? Why is she castigated for getting the number of shots to Nevill wrong, when it was a man high on drugs at the time who related the story? The bank manager, Alan Dovey, informs us there was no pressure exerted upon him on whether to prosecute or not, but again this falsehood is wheeled out.
The Bamberettes just can't accept that Jeremy killed five, including blowing the brains out of two six-year-old boys, in order to buy a £38,000 Porsche. Face up to it.
..and who could blame anybody for not understanding, for the incomprehensibility of it all, that Jeremy would compass his end only by the exercise of the most extreme violence? Is this an inherent evil, the extermination of five lives for a material good, can this human desire be surmounted by educational instruction, or is humanity doomed to suffer this condition as the selfish gene prevails?
As Jeremy told Julie at Blazer's Restaurant, Blackheath: "
Maybe there is something wrong with me." But the admission came far too late, after the deed had been done with the concomitant damage to their relationship, irrevocably broken, the poem Julie had written the only remnant which made Jeremy cry, as Julie exacted her pound of flesh for the dilemma she now faced.