So have you read it whether it was shared directly or indirectly? I understand they are belt and braces.
It doesn't matter what anyone's view is of the CCRC. If an appellant wants a referral to the CoA its the only way forward. You seem to take the view that the CCRC should take onboard anything and everything. CCRC aren't the legislators. CCRC need submissions that fit the narrow criteria if the appellant wants a referral.
I don't see any point having a service with no teeth, that more often than not merely acts as a gatekeeper.
Citizens of the UK deserve to have genuinely robust mechanisms, that root out corruptive practices among police forces with regard to convictions. A body that is if necessary, prepared to take police forces to court to force disclosure. A body that challenges certificates used to hide things at Kew records.
The UK needs police forces to be scared of fitting people up in the first place. Clearly, in the 1980's and since that time, the police have often resorted to dark tactics and collusion.
There should be record of Judges' trials that focusses on wrongful convictions and different grades of suspected wrongful convictions. The same with expert prosecution witnesses.
Then we might get some prison space freed up for people who should actually be there.
