0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
The nightdress was an equally strong piece of evidence - No GSR. No oil. No damage. Only Sheila's blood. Shows Sheila had gone to bed. Shows Sheila had just got out of bed. Lack of blood on nightdress suggests she had not walked after the first shot (COA). Sheila's legs pulled after the second shot. Bloodied palm print on nightdress not Sheila's. ----------The relatives never had this in their possession. So the CT never mention it.
Nine.
