The best posts recently from a guilt perspective, are when yourself and others are posting alongside HB.
I understand you and Bubo have debated seriously as well, as did HB for a while.
Outside of this, there seems to be nothing of substance regarding attacking Bill's claims / findings / research, whatever you want to call it. Now I say this with a caveat - and that is, I am somebody who is sceptical about a call from Nevill; and I'm aware that for those who support guilt, this one aspect can tend to be used to dismiss BR entirely.
This is why I've suggested that Bamber be taken out of the equation and that those who support guilt should read the non Bamber articles on CCRC Watch.
I do agree with the suggestion that Bill is disrespected on here, due to his findings and arguments. And that shouldn't be the case. We don't do this to HB when he rather skillfully sifts through statement evidence to present the guilt case.
Thanks Roch, HB is on tour at the moment with his bike and Tent, at the side of the river Thames at Chertsey, been on the road for a while yet, not much battery life for phone though 🙈. Soon travelling to Oxford.