0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Think the first few blows may have been while holding the rifle conventionally. But switched as he still was showing signs of life.
Any scenario should be minimalistic. We don't need a 2 hour build up. Five minutes before the first shot up to the last shot is sufficient. It just needs to be shown a scenario can match the crime scene in a credible way.
Still clinging to the staged crime sceneWhat about all the cycling, climbing through windows, phoning JM, looking up phone numbers, making false phone calls to the police are these not part of your scenario
A lot of BuboBubo's scenario does not match the crime scene. So is dismissed before it even starts. He has said he believes the crime scene was staged although has no evidence.The problem is my Bamber scenario matches the crime scene like a glove. BuboBubo is well aware he has to create a credible Sheila scenario which matches the crime scene evidence. Unlike Rob & ILB, hopefully a second scenario will be submitted.
BuboBubo's scenario also has invented actions I do not believe would happen. But appreciate that is just my opinion. These are on page 1.
It would be great for an accused person to create a brand new crime scene. Then say 'look, it wasn't me. It was him/her'. That is not how the legal system works. The accepted crime scene from 1985 must be used.
BuboBubo complains about me creating threads on the sourced evidence. I don't really like him inventing new crime scenes & saying the crime scene was staged. But have not complained to the moderators about that.
Sorry Adam we are not playing Monopoly and not posting what guilters do not like to read is not a forum rule